ArticleNature communications2026
Earth system simulations suggest that the Proterozoic ocean was greener but less productive.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Geological records suggest that marine phytoplankton might have arisen in the Proterozoic while zooplankton remained absent, and marine productivity was not excessively low. However, quantitative estimates of phytoplankton biomass and net primary productivity remain elusive. Here, we use the Community Earth System Model version 1.2.2, modifying biological module and boundary conditions, to simulate marine biogeochemical cycles in the Proterozoic. The simulations demonstrate that, within the expected range of nutrient levels, phytoplankton at sea surface was more than 2 times denser than present, sustaining a greener ocean due to the absence of predators. Heavier surface chlorophyll in the Proterozoic would block sunlight from reaching subsurface layers. This so-called self-shielding effect would decrease subsurface net primary productivity significantly. Simulations show that, through the combined influence of low nitrate level under a low-oxygen environment, the absence of diatoms, and self-shielding, the Proterozoic net primary productivity was only approximately 60% and 30% of the present level in warm (almost ice-free) and cold (sea-ice reaches around 30°N/S) periods, respectively. These findings are subject to uncertainties in model framework and Proterozoic nutrients levels; a slightly less green ocean or more productive ocean was possible if the phosphorus level was much lower or higher than the present level.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.