ArticleNature communications2026
Chemical staining for fundamental studies and optimization of binders in Li-ion battery negative electrodes.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Fast method for assessing binder migration in lithium-ion battery electrodes using glow discharge-sector field-mass spectrometry.Communications chemistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The spatial distribution of binders in Li-ion battery electrodes is critical to electrode performance, yet remains challenging to visualise, limiting binder optimisation efforts to chemical modifications rather than spatial control. Here, we show an accessible approach to staining carboxymethyl cellulose and styrene butadiene rubber binders in graphitic and Si-based Li-ion electrodes with silver and bromine, enabling detailed electron imaging and precise spectroscopic quantification of the binder domain. Leveraging these methods, we perform binder-informed optimisation of electrode manufacturing, achieving a 14% reduction in electronic resistivity, suppression of binder migration during high-temperature electrode drying, and a 40% decrease in electrode ionic resistance. Furthermore, staining enables electrode-scale, high-resolution backscattered electron imaging of complex binder hierarchies, revealing multiple types of agglomerates and elusive nanoscale binder films. These films completely coat graphitic surfaces in pristine electrodes but shatter into highly inhomogeneous fragments after calendering in both research-grade and commercial electrodes, presenting new perspectives on interpreting common cycling stability and electrode performance issues. We show how binder staining can advance fundamental understanding, quality control and manufacturing optimisation of Li-ion electrodes, particularly those based on widely used water-processable binders.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.