ArticleBMJ open2026
Unravelling antecedents and bidirectional impacts of nurse work rumination: a scoping review to enhance nurses' well-being and improve nursing quality.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGlobally, work rumination is a common phenomenon related to nurse burnout. However, most existing studies focus on the single negative impacts of rumination, with less exploration of its dual effects and antecedents. Therefore, comprehensively exploring the effect of nurse work rumination and its influencing factors is crucial for enhancing the accuracy of nursing management.
objectivesIdentify the antecedents and dual effects of nurse work rumination to deepen understanding of this phenomenon and provide references for formulating interventions that enhance nurses' well-being and improve the quality of nursing work. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Included studies were original research articles focusing on work-related rumination of nurses in clinical settings. Excluded studies were those involving nurses without patient contact, rumination unrelated to work, studies not addressing the effects or influencing factors of rumination and non-Chinese or non-English language publications. SOURCES OF EVIDENCE: CINAHL, Cochrane, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Pubmed, Scopus, Web of Science, Sinomed, Wanfang, VIP and CNKI were searched to identify articles about nurse work rumination which were published up to January 2025. CHARTING
methodsA scoping review of the published articles of nurse work rumination was performed with the methodological process guided by the framework proposed by Arksey and O'Malley. A three-step coding procedure was used to synthesise the impacts and antecedents of nurse work rumination, which were subdivided into four categories individually based on the conservation of resources theory, the three-dimension theory of happiness and the distinctive features of the nursing profession.
results30 articles from 12 countries were included. The findings indicate that nurse work rumination has 28 kinds of impacts, including positive, negative and double-edged sword effects, in four aspects: nursing quality and safety (n=7), happiness (n=7), health (n=10) and relationship (n=4) from 29 articles. The findings also suggest that from 26 articles, work rumination will be influenced by 31 factors, which are based on conservation of resources theory classified into four categories: resource depletion (n=14), resource protection (n=4), consequences of resource depletion (n=5) and behaviour and cognition (n=8).
conclusionsThis scoping review constructs a conceptual framework of 'antecedent factors-nurse work rumination-dual impacts' by systematically synthesising 30 studies. Rooted in the conservation of resources theory, three-dimensional theory of happiness and nursing professional characteristics, the framework clarifies the classification logic and internal connections of 31 influencing factors and 28 bidirectional impacts. The positive effect of work rumination can promote nurses' personal development by facilitating the problem-solving pondering. Nursing managers can leverage this integrated framework to design targeted intervention strategies, maximising the constructive effects of rumination while mitigating its adverse impacts. Classifying the factors affecting nurse work rumination according to the conservation of resources theory provides an important basis for exploring the influence mechanism of nurse work rumination. Future research should focus more on empirical studies on rumination to reduce nurses' burnout and improve the quality of nursing work.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.