ArticleBMJ global health2026
COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and recommendation among health workers in nine countries: a pooled analysis of survey data from 2023 to 2024.
Article in BMJ global health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionHealth workers (HWs) set an example for vaccine recipients, convey vaccine benefits and risks and interface with patients at increased risk for complications in pandemic settings. We explored HWs' acceptance of and recommendation for COVID-19 vaccine with and without previous receipt of seasonal influenza vaccine (SIV) in nine countries.
methodsIn 2023-2024, cross-sectional surveys among HW were conducted in Bangladesh, Cote d'Ivoire, Ghana, Laos, Lebanon, Morocco, Philippines, Thailand and Tunisia. Country researchers used a standard protocol and questionnaire to assess beliefs, perceptions and acceptance around SIV and COVID-19 vaccine and likelihood of recommending these vaccines to patients. Pooled findings were stratified by the presence or absence of a national HW SIV recommendation. Generalised mixed effects models were used to characterise the relationship between receipt of SIV and COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and recommendation, adjusting for WHO region, sex and duration of employment.
resultsOur analysis included 12 296 HWs from nine countries representing four WHO regions: African, Eastern Mediterranean, Southeast Asian and Western Pacific. Five countries had a national HW SIV recommendation (61% of HWs surveyed) prior to COVID-19 vaccine introduction. More than 90% of HWs reported completing the COVID-19 vaccination series, whereas intention to continue receiving annual COVID-19 vaccine was lower (61%). HWs who received SIV in the last season compared with those who did not were more likely to have received one or more COVID-19 booster doses (adjusted OR (aOR) 2.63, 95% CI 2.27 to 3.04) and to have recommended COVID-19 vaccine to patients (aOR 1.53, 95% CI 1.29 to 1.82).
conclusionsPrior experience with SIV was associated with HW behaviour and recommendations regarding COVID-19 vaccination. Intention to continue receiving COVID-19 vaccines remains a challenge; ongoing training and education for vaccination staff could be beneficial. HWs play a critical role in the successful delivery of new and existing vaccines, particularly in a pandemic setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.