Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41702567›Full record

ArticleJournal of sleep research2026

Concurrent Presentation of Memory-Related Odours and Sounds Nullified Sleep Reactivation Benefits.

Gayathri Subramanian, Christina Zelano, Ken A Paller, Eitan Schechtman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of sleep research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Gayathri SubramanianDepartment of Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA.
Christina ZelanoDepartment of Neurology, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, USA.
Ken A PallerDepartment of Psychology, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4415-4143
Eitan SchechtmanDepartment of Neurobiology and Behavior and Center for Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, University of California, Irvine, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8127-012X

Funding

Micromanaging Human Sleep Physiology to Treat Sleep Apnea and Other DisordersDP1HL179370 · NHLBI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY · PI KEN A PALLER · 2024 to 2026
$5.6M
The role of context in sleep-related memory reactivation in humansR00MH122663 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI SCHECHTMAN-DRAYMAN, EITAN · 2023 to 2025
$933k
The role of context in sleep-related memory reactivation in humansK99MH122663 · NIMH · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY · PI SCHECHTMAN-DRAYMAN, EITAN · 2021 to 2022
$186k
NHLBI NIH HHS DP1 HL179370NIH HHS DP1-HL179370NIH HHS K99-MH122663NIH HHS R00-MH122663NIMH NIH HHS K99 MH122663NIMH NIH HHS R00 MH122663
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reactivation of recently acquired memories during sleep supports their longevity. Reactivation can be altered during sleep using odours or sounds through a technique termed targeted memory reactivation (TMR). Here, we attempted to selectively weaken memories by reactivating them together with forgetting instructions. We delivered sounds to reactivate spatial memories and concurrent odours to reactivate instructions. Participants learned about the instructions in a Directed-Forgetting task performed with a list of to-be-remembered and to-be-forgotten words. One odour was linked with instructions to forget, one with instructions to remember, and a third was not assigned any meaning. During a nap, sounds previously linked with object-location learning were simultaneously presented with these odours. Spatial recall was tested after sleep. Sound cues produced a selective recall benefit for weakly encoded memories. However, memory results did not support the prediction that forgetting could be instilled by the concurrent Forget odour. An encoding-strength-dependent benefit was largest when sounds were presented together with the odour that lacked assigned meaning, whereas the other two odours both disrupted sound-induced memory reactivation. These two odours were linked with instructions and with multiple learning episodes in the Directed-Forgetting task. Accordingly, we infer that reactivation evoked by the Remember and Forget odour cues interfered with the reactivation of spatial memories. Odours also induced a prolonged decline in sigma EEG power (12-16 Hz) that continued at least 10 s after odour offset. Overall, these findings highlight the complexity of memory consolidation during sleep when multiple memories and multiple cues are involved.

Indexed as

MemoryMental RecallOdorantsSleepSoundAcoustic StimulationAdultCuesFemaleHumansMaleSpatial MemoryYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID41702567
PMCPMC13047899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.