Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41701950›Full record

Observational studyJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2026

Long-Term Prospective Cohort Study of Cervical Cancer Screening Using Triage of Women Who Are Human Papillomavirus-Positive With Dual Stain and Human Papillomavirus Genotyping.

Nicolas Wentzensen, Didem Egemen, Megan A Clarke, Nancy Poitras, Kiranjit Grewal, Patricia Goldhoff, Elizabeth Hosfield, Mark Schiffman, Marianne Hyer, Philip E Castle and 6 more

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. How to evaluate and select cervical screening and triage tests in vaccinated populations.Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Nicolas WentzensenDivision of Cancer Epidemiology & Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD.ORCID 0000-0003-1251-0836
Didem EgemenDivision of Cancer Epidemiology & Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD.ORCID 0000-0001-5617-4585
Megan A ClarkeDivision of Cancer Epidemiology & Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD.ORCID 0000-0003-0435-7376
Nancy PoitrasKaiser Permanente Northern California, Berkeley, CA.ORCID 0000-0003-3579-275X
Kiranjit GrewalKaiser Permanente Northern California, Berkeley, CA.
Patricia GoldhoffKaiser Permanente Northern California, Berkeley, CA.
Elizabeth HosfieldKaiser Permanente Northern California, Berkeley, CA.
Mark SchiffmanDivision of Cancer Epidemiology & Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD.
Marianne HyerInformation Management Services, Rockville, MD.
Philip E CastleDivision of Cancer Epidemiology & Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD.ORCID 0000-0003-1082-6554
Laurie FullerKaiser Permanente Northern California, Berkeley, CA.
Greg RydzakInformation Management Services, Rockville, MD.
Li C CheungDivision of Cancer Epidemiology & Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD.ORCID 0000-0003-1625-4331
Walter KinneyKaiser Permanente Northern California, Berkeley, CA.
Betty Suh-BurgmannKaiser Permanente Northern California, Berkeley, CA.
Thomas LoreyKaiser Permanente Northern California, Berkeley, CA.

Funding

Human papillomavirus (HPV) infection and cervical and anal cancersZIACP010124 · NCI · DIVISION OF CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY AND GENETICS · PI WENTZENSEN, NICOLAS · 2009 to 2025
$17.3M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA CP010124
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePrimary human papillomavirus (HPV) testing has the best tradeoff of benefits and harms for cervical screening but requires triage to determine management among HPV positives. We conducted a prospective observational study to evaluate triage of women who are HPV-positive using dual stain (DS) and HPV genotyping. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe included 9,645 consecutive women who are HPV-positive undergoing cervical screening in two periods between 2015 and 2017 in the organized cervical screening program at Kaiser Permanente Northern California. Absolute risk and clinical performance of DS and cytology for detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 and greater (CIN3+) were estimated overall and by HPV genotype and by age. Cumulative absolute risk of CIN3+ was modeled over 5 years using a prevalence-incidence mixture model, which allows estimating risk accounting for differences in disease ascertainment, surveillance intervals, and compliance.

resultsThe baseline risk of CIN3+ was 9.4% and 0.8% for women testing positive and negative for DS, respectively, and 6.9% and 2.0% for women testing positive and negative for cytology, respectively. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values for CIN3+ detection were better for DS compared with cytology over 5 years (

conclusionLong-term reassurance of low risk among DS negatives suggests that DS detects molecular changes earlier in the carcinogenic pathway than cytology. DS has better risk stratification than cytology overall, within HPV risk strata, and across all screening age groups and is a better option for triage of vaccinated populations.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerHuman Papillomavirus VirusesPapillomavirus InfectionsTriageUterine Cervical DysplasiaUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAdultAgedFemaleGenotypeHumansMiddle AgedProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID41701950
PMCPMC13537703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.