Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41701936›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical education2026

Artificial Intelligence in Medical Education: Transformative Potential, Current Applications, and Future Implications.

Juan S Izquierdo-Condoy, Marlon Arias-Intriago, Laura Montero Corrales, Esteban Ortiz-Prado

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Juan S Izquierdo-CondoyOne Health Research Group, Universidad de Las Américas, Via Nayon S/N, Quito, 170124, Ecuador, +593 995760693.ORCID 0000-0002-1178-0546
Marlon Arias-IntriagoOne Health Research Group, Universidad de Las Américas, Via Nayon S/N, Quito, 170124, Ecuador, +593 995760693.ORCID 0009-0002-3717-383X
Laura Montero CorralesEscuela de Comunicación, Universidad Latina de Costa Rica, San Jose, Costa Rica.ORCID 0000-0002-3752-9421
Esteban Ortiz-PradoOne Health Research Group, Universidad de Las Américas, Via Nayon S/N, Quito, 170124, Ecuador, +593 995760693.ORCID 0000-0002-1895-7498

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Unlabelled: Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly influencing medical education by enabling adaptive learning, AI-assisted assessment, and scalable instructional tools. Natural language processing, machine learning, and generative large language models offer innovative ways to support teaching and learning, yet their integration raises ethical, pedagogical, and infrastructural challenges. This viewpoint article aims to examine the current applications, benefits, and challenges of AI in medical education and propose strategies for responsible and effective integration. AI tools such as chatbots, virtual patients, and intelligent tutoring systems enhance personalized and immersive learning. Automated grading and predictive analytics support efficient evaluations, while AI-assisted writing tools streamline content creation. Despite these advances, concerns persist around data privacy, algorithmic bias, unequal access, and diminished critical thinking. Key solutions include AI literacy training, data oversight, equitable infrastructure, and curriculum reform. The FACETS framework offers 6 dimensions (ie, form, application, context, instructional mode, technology, and the SAMR [substitution, augmentation, modification, redefinition model]) to evaluate AI integration effectively. AI offers substantial opportunities to transform medical education, but its adoption must be ethical, equitable, and pedagogically grounded. Strategic frameworks such as FACETS, combined with institutional governance and cross-sector collaboration, are essential to guide implementation so that AI enhances learning outcomes while preserving the humanistic foundations of medical practice.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceEducation, MedicalForecastingGenerative Artificial IntelligenceHumansLarge Language Modelsadaptive learning systemsartificial intelligencefuture implicationsmachine learningmedical education

Identifiers

PMID41701936
PMCPMC12912660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.