ArticlePLoS computational biology2026
Efficient Gaussian process-based motor hotspot hunting with concurrent optimization of TMS coil location and orientation.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a widely used non-invasive brain stimulation technique in neuroscience research and clinical applications. TMS-based motor hotspot hunting describes the process of identifying the optimal scalp location to elicit robust and reliable motor responses. It is critical to ensure reproducibility of TMS parameters, as well as to determine safe and precise stimulation intensities in both healthy participants and patients. Typically, this process targets motor responses in contralateral short hand muscles. However, hotspot hunting remains challenging due to the vast parameter space and time constraints. To address this, we present an approach that concurrently optimizes both spatial and angular TMS parameters for hotspot hunting using Gaussian processes and Bayesian optimization. We systematically evaluated five state-of-the-art acquisition functions on electromyographic TMS data from eight healthy individuals enhanced by simulated data from generative models. Our results consistently demonstrate that optimizing spatial and angular TMS parameters simultaneously enhances the efficacy and spatial precision of hotspot hunting. Furthermore, we provide mechanistic insights into the acquisition function behavior and the impact of coil rotation constraints, revealing critical limitations in current hotspot-hunting strategies. Specifically, we show that arbitrary constraints on coil rotation angle are suboptimal, as they reduce flexibility and fail to account for individual variability. We further demonstrate that acquisition functions differ in sampling strategies and performance. Functions overly emphasizing exploitation tend to converge prematurely to local optima, whereas those balancing exploration and exploitation-particularly Thompson sampling-achieve superior performance. These findings highlight the importance of acquisition function selection and the necessity of removing restrictive coil rotation constraints for effective hotspot hunting. Our work advances TMS-based hotspot identification, potentially reducing participant burden and improving safety in both research and clinical applications beyond the motor cortex.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.