ArticlePLoS computational biology2026
MENDELSEEK: An algorithm that predicts mendelian genes and elucidates what makes them special.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Although individual Mendelian diseases-those caused by a single gene-are rare, their collective disease burden is substantial. Identifying the causal gene for each condition is essential for accurate diagnosis and effective treatment. Yet, despite decades of research, the genetic basis of more than half of all known Mendelian diseases remains unresolved. To address this gap, we introduce MENDELSEEK, a machine learning framework that predicts Mendelian genes by integrating residue variation scores with pathway participation, Gene Ontology processes, and protein language model features. In benchmarking across 16,946 human genes with 10-fold cross-validation, MENDELSEEK achieved an AUC of 0.869 and an AUPR of 0.737-substantially outperforming the next best methods, ENTPRISE+ENTPRISE-X (AUC 0.781; AUPR 0.626), and REVEL (AUC 0.585; AUPR 0.401). When applied to the full set of 17,858 human genes, MENDELSEEK predicted 1,277 novel Mendelian gene candidates with precision greater than 0.7. Analysis further revealed that Mendelian genes engage in significantly more protein-protein interactions than non-Mendelian genes and are evolutionarily ancient. Together, these results highlight MENDELSEEK as a major advance over existing methods, offering new insights into the biochemical features that distinguish Mendelian from non-Mendelian genes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.