Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41701785›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2026

Development of a qPCR assay for Fasciola spp. identification and a deep amplicon sequencing method for differentiation of fluke species in UK livestock.

Muhammad Abbas, Kezia Kozel, Olukayode Daramola, Nick Selemetas, Qasim Ali, Shoaib Ashraf, Ibrahim Isah, Inaki Deza-Cruz, Sai Fingerhood, Mark W Robinson and 3 more

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Muhammad AbbasDiscipline of Comparative Biomedical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom.
Kezia KozelDiscipline of Comparative Biomedical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom.
Olukayode DaramolaSchool of Veterinary Medicine, University of Lancashire, Preston, United Kingdom.
Nick SelemetasDiscipline of Microbes, Infection and Immunity, School of Veterinary Biosciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom.
Qasim AliDepartment of Pathobiology, University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Swat, Pakistan.
Shoaib AshrafDepartment of Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Riphah International University, Lahore, Pakistan.
Ibrahim IsahDepartment of Veterinary Parasitology and Entomology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria.
Inaki Deza-CruzThe Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies and The Roslin Institute, The University of Edinburgh Easter Bush Veterinary Centre, Midlothian, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Sai FingerhoodDepartment of Veterinary Pathology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Mark W RobinsonSchool of Biological Sciences, Queen's University, Belfast, United Kingdom.
Eric R MorganSchool of Biological Sciences, Queen's University, Belfast, United Kingdom.
Umer ChaudhryDepartment of Veterinary Biomedical Sciences, Lewyt College of Veterinary Medicine, Long Island University, Brookville, New York, United States of America.
Martha BetsonDiscipline of Comparative Biomedical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4220-3290

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTrematode parasites, or flukes, are a significant economic threat to ruminant production worldwide. Traditional diagnostic methods rely on egg sedimentation from faeces, a time-consuming methodology lacking sensitivity and specificity. This study aimed to develop and validate two detection methods: firstly, qPCR for accurate identification of Fasciola spp., and secondly, a deep amplicon sequencing technique for identifying fluke species using faecal sedimented egg DNA. METHODOLOGY: To detect Fasciola spp., infection, primers targeting mitochondrial DNA were repurposed to develop a SYBR Green qPCR assay. For the identification of fluke species, a deep amplicon sequencing approach was developed. A reference sequence library and taxonomy file were generated for 21 fluke species, potentially enabling species-level sequence read separation for a range of trematodes and extraction of amplicon sequence variants (ASVs). To validate the qPCR and deep amplicon sequencing approach, 402 faecal samples were collected from cattle and sheep across the UK. Fluke eggs were isolated by sedimentation, screened by microscopy and qPCR, Sanger sequencing and deep amplicon sequencing to identify fluke eggs to species level.

resultsqPCR demonstrated high analytical sensitivity, detecting Fasciola hepatica DNA down to 19.2 fg and F. gigantica down to 6.4 fg, with no cross-amplification of other flukes. Deep amplicon sequencing was able to detect as few as five F. hepatica and Calicophoron daubneyi eggs and identify mixed infections. High levels of co-infection (14.4%) of F. hepatica and C. daubneyi were observed in faecal samples, followed by single infections with C. daubneyi (12.6%) and F. hepatica (3.2%). Notably, deep amplicon sequencing detected F. hepatica in 20 samples missed by qPCR. Data analysis identified 55 and 32 ASVs for F. hepatica and C. daubneyi, respectively, with phylogenetic clustering within their respective clades.

conclusionThis study developed a qPCR assay for Fasciola spp. detection and validated a deep amplicon sequencing for fluke species differentiation. These approaches are able to identify fluke species in excreta from infected ruminants and provide additional valuable tools for enhancing fasciolosis surveillance and control.

Indexed as

Cattle DiseasesFasciolaFascioliasisHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionSheep DiseasesAnimalsCattleDNA, HelminthFecesLivestockSensitivity and SpecificitySheepUnited KingdomDNA, Helminth

Identifiers

PMID41701785
PMCPMC12928598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.