Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41701776›Full record

ArticleeLife2026

On the nature of the earliest known lifeforms.

Dheeraj Kanaparthi, Frances Westall, Marko Lampe, Baoli Zhu, Thomas Boesen, Bettina Scheu, Andreas Klingl, Petra Schwille, Tillmann Lueders

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Aspects of plant intelligence (ii).Plant signaling & behavior · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. What the earliest evidence for life tells us about the early evolution of the biosphere.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Dheeraj KanaparthiMax-Planck Institute for Biochemistry, Munich, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1009-4103
Frances WestallCNRS-Centre de Biophysique Moléculaire, Orléans, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1938-5823
Marko LampeAdvanced Light Microscopy Facility, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4510-9048
Baoli ZhuChair of Ecological Microbiology, BayCeer, University of Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany.
Thomas BoesenDepartment of Biosciences, Center for Electromicrobiology, Aarhus, Denmark.
Bettina ScheuEarth and environmental sciences, Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Germany.
Andreas KlinglDepartment of Botany I, Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Germany.
Petra SchwilleMax-Planck Institute for Biochemistry, Munich, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6106-4847
Tillmann LuedersChair of Ecological Microbiology, BayCeer, University of Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9361-5009

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft DFG-TRR174European Research Council 616644Seed funding from Excellence Cluster ORIGINS EXC2094 - 390783311
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microfossils from the Paleoarchean Eon are the oldest known evidence of life. Despite their significance in understanding the history of life on Earth, any interpretation of the nature of these microfossils has been a point of contention among researchers. Decades of back-and-forth arguments led to the consensus that reconstructing the lifecycles of Archaean Eon organisms is the most promising way of understanding the nature of these microfossils. Here, we transformed a Gram-positive bacterium into a primitive lipid vesicle-like state and studied it under environmental conditions prevalent on early Earth. Using this approach, we successfully reconstructed morphologies and life cycles of Archaean microfossils. In addition to reproducing microfossil morphologies, we conducted experiments that spanned years to understand the process of cell degradation and how Archaean cells could have undergone encrustation of minerals (in this case, salt), leading to their preservation as fossilized organic carbon in the rock record. These degradation products strongly resemble fossiliferous features from Archaean rock formations. Our observations suggest that microfossils aged between 3.8-2.5 Ga most likely were liposome-like protocells that have evolved physiological pathways of energy conservation but not the mechanisms to regulate their morphology. Based on these observations, we propose that morphology is not a reliable indicator of taxonomy in these microfossils.

Indexed as

FossilsOrigin of Lifearchaean eonbiofilmsevolutionary biologymicrofossil morphologymicrofossilsorigin of lifeprotocells

Identifiers

PMID41701776
PMCPMC12912728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.