SynthesisPLoS neglected tropical diseases2026
Effectiveness of community-based and community-led interventions to improve the psychosocial well-being of those affected by skin-NTDs: A systematic review.
Synthesis in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Saving faces is not enough: Mental health must become core noma care.PLOS mental health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionSkin-related neglected tropical diseases (skin-NTDs) are a subgroup of neglected tropical diseases (NTDs) that present with manifestations of the skin, often leading to stigmatization and discrimination of those affected. Community models may be a promising feature in improving the mental health of those affected by skin-NTDs by providing mental health care or resources in areas without formal mental health services. This review aimed to identify existing community-based interventions for improving the psychosocial well-being of individuals affected by skin-NTDs, as well as to evaluate their effectiveness. Sub-questions focused on identifying which interventions are also community-led and evaluating cost-effectiveness. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPLE
findingsThis study is a systematic review, and the protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD420251015152). The interventions were evaluated according to an integrated framework and if provided, the cost-effectiveness of the interventions was also assessed. 16 papers were included in this review, and interventions were grouped as either: (I) Group-based, (II) Counselling, (III) Basic Psychological Support, (IV) Management Programs, or (V) Mixed interventions. Results indicated that community-based interventions were effective in reducing internalized stigma and improving the well-being of persons affected by skin-NTDs. Results emphasized how community leadership of interventions is a foundation for its sustainability. There was sparse information on the cost of interventions. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: The findings emphasize that community leadership and participatory methods are a promising method for research in this field and future research should aim to follow this. While only a few interventions addressed multiple skin-NTDs, there is potential for integration of these interventions, both in addressing multiple diseases and for integration within local health structures. The findings highlight that effective interventions exist to support communities without formal mental health resources to improve the psychosocial well-being of those affected by skin-NTDs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.