ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2026
Statistical methods for predicting the presence of Salmonella Typhi in wastewater samples at Asante Akyem Agogo, Ghana.
Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMonitoring wastewater is vital for tracking typhoid fever in endemic areas. This study evaluated the performance of both spatial and non-spatial models in predicting Salmonella Typhi detection in wastewater from the Asante Akim North district in Ghana and identified key environmental risk factors.
methodsWe collected wastewater samples of Moore swabs at 40 sites across Agogo, Juansa, Hwidiem, and Domeabra over a period of 27 months. Multiplex PCR was used to detect Salmonella Typhi, focusing on the ttr, tviB, and staG genes. An Aquaprobe AP-2000 was also used to measure different physicochemical factors, such as pH, temperature, dissolved oxygen, and salinity. Three non-spatial models, namely Generalized Estimating Equations (Logistic), Mixed-Effects Models, and Random Forest, as well as four spatial models, including Bayesian Generalized Additive Models (GAM) and Spatial Generalized Linear Mixed Models (GLMM), were fitted to the wastewater dataset. Model fitting was done using 5-fold cross-validation, stratified by site. Model performance was evaluated using accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. We also used SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis to find the most important predictors.
findingsIn general, 44.13% of the samples tested positive for S. Typhi. Detection was much higher during wet seasons (50.17% vs. 35.11%; p < 0.001), with fast flows (64.45%), and in channels that were 1-2 meters wide (58.70%). Positive samples had relatively higher pH (7.46 vs. 7.40; p < 0.001), dissolved oxygen (46.97% vs. 36.77%; p < 0.001), and rainfall (3.92mm vs. 3.30mm; p = 0.022). In comparing both non-spatial and spatial models, the non-spatial Random Forest model demonstrated the highest performance with an accuracy of 0.993, sensitivity of 0.997, and specificity of 0.989. In the SHAP analysis of the preferred non-spatial random forest model, it was found that pH, season, dissolved oxygen, positivity from the previous month, and channel width were identified as the best predictors.
conclusionS. Typhi detection is influenced by wastewater physicochemical properties, with pH, seasonal rainfall, and hydraulic conditions being the most significant. The non-spatial random forest model significantly outperforms both spatial and other non-spatial statistical methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.