ArticlePloS one2026
Barriers and facilitators from the patients' perspective in the follow-up of carpal tunnel syndrome and subacromial impingement syndrome: A qualitative study.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionChronic musculoskeletal pain is one of the leading causes of disability worldwide, affecting 11-50% of the population. In Spain, it accounts for up to 50% of the chronic pain consultations conducted in primary care settings. The most common disorders are carpal tunnel and subacromial impingement syndromes, with treatments, including surgical and nonsurgical approaches, notably the use of ultrasound-guided injections to improve symptoms.
methodsA qualitative, phenomenological, and inductive study was conducted on patients diagnosed with carpal tunnel syndrome or subacromial impingement syndrome at primary care centers in Lleida to identify patient‑reported domains relevant to the routine follow-up of CTS and SAIS in primary healthcare, and to examine barriers and facilitators of treatments to inform patient‑centered follow-up protocols. Purposive sampling was used, and five focus groups were organised, selecting participants aged >18 years with or without prior surgical treatment. Data were collected between December 2022 and February 2023 using a semi-structured guide. The focus groups were recorded and thematically analysed using Atlas.ti.
resultsTwenty-one patients aged between 44-75 years, predominantly women, participated in the study. The results were organised into six themes and 12 subthemes. The barriers identified were delays in diagnostic testing, overload of healthcare personnel, lack of coordination between care levels, and brevity of consultations. Effective communication, empathy of primary care professionals, and prompt management of treatments, such as injections, were highlighted as facilitators.
conclusionThis study highlighted the complexity of managing chronic musculoskeletal pain and the need for a multidimensional approach. The identified barriers, along with facilitators, such as effective communication and empathy of professionals, emphasize the relevance of strengthening problem-solving capacity in primary care and fostering better coordination between care levels. These findings suggest that addressing these aspects may support more tailored follow-up and contribute to improving patients' experiences of care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.