ArticlePLOS global public health2026
Refractive error among school-aged children in Bhutan: A secondary analysis of data from nationwide Bhutan School Sight Survey.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to determine the prevalence, demographic distribution, and predictors of refractive error (RE) among school children in Bhutan using secondary data from the 2019 Bhutan School Sight Survey (BSSS). It also sought to compare these population-level findings with standardized estimates from the Refractive Error Study in Children (RESC). Secondary data from 586 schools, comprising 164,365 school-enrolled children aged 5-18 years (94.3% of the national school-age population), were analyzed. As part of the BSSS, vision screening and cycloplegic refraction were conducted following the RESC protocol. Spectacles were provided at no cost to children requiring correction. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse data on demographic and school-related variables, and logistic regression to identify associated predictors. Findings were compared with previously published RESC data to contextualise observed trends. Visual impairment (VI) affected 12.14% (95% CI: 11.98-12.30) of school-aged children in Bhutan, with higher rates in females (13.16%) than males (11.07%) (p < 0.01). RE was the leading cause, accounting for 11.71% of all cases and 96.1% of VI. Myopia was most common (5.78%), followed by astigmatism (5.26%) and hypermetropia (0.67%). Multivariate analysis showed that female students (AOR = 1.18), those in private schools (AOR = 1.41), and urban schooling (AOR = 1.68) were significant RE predictors (p < 0.01). Of 19,243 students diagnosed with RE, only 11.5% had appropriate spectacles. Among those needing new spectacles (n = 17,021), 96.2% eventually received them within four months, while 3.8% were lost to follow-up. In Bhutan, RE affects over 10% of school children, primarily due to myopia and astigmatism. The higher burden among females, urban students, and private schools highlights persistent inequities. These results are consistent with prior RESC findings and demonstrate that large-scale school screening is both feasible and scalable. Strengthening school-based vision services, timely spectacle delivery, and cross-sectoral coordination are essential to close the gap and address uncorrected RE.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.