ArticlePloS one2026
Intraoperative 3D quantitative magnetic resonance imaging in paediatric brain tumour surgery.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose• To investigate if R1 and R2 can reliably be measured using 3D quantitative MRI in an intraoperative setting when paediatric brain tumour surgery is performed. • To determine whether B1+ inhomogeneities affect R1 and R2 measurements in normal-appearing white matter and the thalamus, respectively, and how R1 and R2 measurements are affected by different coils. • To assess how the relaxation parameters of brain tissue are affected by the intraoperative setting.
methodsThe accuracy of R1 and R2, the effect of B1+-field inhomogeneity and how the flex coil position affected R1 and R2 were evaluated, both pre- and intraoperatively during surgery. Ten patients were recruited, six girls and four boys aged 2-15 years, with varying tumour entities, all referred to surgery with intraoperative MR. The patients were scanned using a head coil preoperatively and flex coils intraoperatively. Control experiments were performed on phantoms in various positions, equivalent to the patient positions. ROIs (Regions of Interest) were positioned in areas representing normal-appearing matter. Relaxation rates R1 and R2 were calculated from 3D-quantification using an interleaved Look-Locker acquisition sequence with T2 preparation pulse (3D-QALAS) data.
resultsThere was a significant increase of R2 in the intraoperative setting compared to the preoperative 3D-QALAS measurements. In contrast to the patient examinations, control experiments using relaxation phantoms did not demonstrate similar differences.
conclusionRelaxometry is feasible in the intraoperative setting. The detected differences between the quantitative R2 values in tissue pre- and intraoperatively seem to be explained by the physiological conditions characterising the surgical situation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.