Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41701710›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2026

Application of machine learning approaches to develop predictive models for diabetes and hypertension among Bangladeshi Adults.

Gulam Muhammed Al Kibria, James Ross O'Hagan, Golam Shariar, Tarina Khan, Mohammed Elfaramawi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Gulam Muhammed Al KibriaDepartment of international Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7037-6658
James Ross O'HaganUS Census Bureau, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Golam ShariarNew York Institute of Technology College of Osteopathic Medicine, New York City, New York, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2011-5182
Tarina KhanNew York Institute of Technology College of Osteopathic Medicine, New York City, New York, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1658-105X
Mohammed ElfaramawiUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With rapid urbanization, lifestyle changes, and an aging population, non-communicable diseases (NCDs), including hypertension and diabetes, pose significant public health challenges in Bangladesh and many other low- and middle-income countries. This study used machine learning (ML) approaches to develop predictive models for hypertension and diabetes among Bangladeshi adults. Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey 2022, a nationally representative cross-sectional survey, data were analyzed. Hypertension was defined as systolic/diastolic blood pressure 140/90 mmHg (or more) or taking any antihypertensive medication. Diabetes was defined as having fasting plasma glucose ≥7.0 mmol/L or using any glucose-lowering drugs. Potential predictors included age, sex, education, wealth quintile, overweight/obesity, rural-urban residence, and division of residence. Descriptive analysis was conducted, and six ML models were applied: artificial neural network (ANN), random forest, adaptive boosting (AdaBoost), gradient boosting, XGBoost, and support vector machine (SVM). Models' performance and feature importance were reported. We included 13,847 adults (females: 55%). Sensitivity was high across models (up to 0.96 and 0.90 for diabetes and hypertension, respectively). However, the overall specificity was low, particularly for diabetes. The prevalence of diabetes and hypertension was 16.3% and 20.5%, respectively. For diabetes, AdaBoost had the highest AUC (0.699), and SVM had the highest accuracy (0.836); for hypertension, AdaBoost had the greatest AUC (0.775) and accuracy (0.799). Hypertension was the most common diabetes predictor, while overweight/obesity was the most common predictor for hypertension, followed by age and diabetes. Wealth and sex were moderately influential, with education and geographic factors less so. Low specificity across models indicated challenges in identifying non-cases. This ML-driven analysis identified the bidirectional relationship of hypertension and diabetes along with several other predictors, including overweight/obesity, older age, and richer household wealth quintiles. Our findings underscore the need for integrated screening and lifestyle interventions targeting high-risk groups to mitigate future NCD burden.

Identifiers

PMID41701710
PMCPMC12912540

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.