ArticlePLOS global public health2026
Application of machine learning approaches to develop predictive models for diabetes and hypertension among Bangladeshi Adults.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Predictors of Undiagnosed Diabetes in the Bangladeshi Female Population: A Propensity Score-Weighted Machine Learning Analysis of BDHS Biomarker Data.Journal of diabetes research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With rapid urbanization, lifestyle changes, and an aging population, non-communicable diseases (NCDs), including hypertension and diabetes, pose significant public health challenges in Bangladesh and many other low- and middle-income countries. This study used machine learning (ML) approaches to develop predictive models for hypertension and diabetes among Bangladeshi adults. Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey 2022, a nationally representative cross-sectional survey, data were analyzed. Hypertension was defined as systolic/diastolic blood pressure 140/90 mmHg (or more) or taking any antihypertensive medication. Diabetes was defined as having fasting plasma glucose ≥7.0 mmol/L or using any glucose-lowering drugs. Potential predictors included age, sex, education, wealth quintile, overweight/obesity, rural-urban residence, and division of residence. Descriptive analysis was conducted, and six ML models were applied: artificial neural network (ANN), random forest, adaptive boosting (AdaBoost), gradient boosting, XGBoost, and support vector machine (SVM). Models' performance and feature importance were reported. We included 13,847 adults (females: 55%). Sensitivity was high across models (up to 0.96 and 0.90 for diabetes and hypertension, respectively). However, the overall specificity was low, particularly for diabetes. The prevalence of diabetes and hypertension was 16.3% and 20.5%, respectively. For diabetes, AdaBoost had the highest AUC (0.699), and SVM had the highest accuracy (0.836); for hypertension, AdaBoost had the greatest AUC (0.775) and accuracy (0.799). Hypertension was the most common diabetes predictor, while overweight/obesity was the most common predictor for hypertension, followed by age and diabetes. Wealth and sex were moderately influential, with education and geographic factors less so. Low specificity across models indicated challenges in identifying non-cases. This ML-driven analysis identified the bidirectional relationship of hypertension and diabetes along with several other predictors, including overweight/obesity, older age, and richer household wealth quintiles. Our findings underscore the need for integrated screening and lifestyle interventions targeting high-risk groups to mitigate future NCD burden.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.