ArticlePloS one2026
Patients' needs and preferences in developing Art-Based Learning in outpatient palliative cancer care: A qualitative study.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeArt-Based Learning (ABL), an art pedagogical practice, may assist cancer patients by providing a meaningful experience through art viewing. However, little is known about what needs to be considered when developing an exhibition space for ABL in a palliative care setting. This study aimed at providing an overview of needs and preferences from a patient perspective.
methodsPatients were included through purposive sampling based on the following criteria: WHO performance status 0 or 1, ≥ 18 years, Dutch proficiency, and ability to come to the hospital. For the online sessions, access to the internet, a device, and a microphone were required. Patients participated in an ABL session either online or in the hospital followed by a semi-structured interview. The transcribed interviews were thematically analyzed using both deductive and inductive approaches.
resultsParticipants (n = 13) had a positive experience with ABL either online (n = 6) or in the hospital (n = 7). The results showed the multidimensionality of the patients' needs and preferences regarding the exhibition and ABL, from preferences regarding the exhibition space and needs for accessibility both online and on-site, to personalization of ABL by the facilitator.
conclusionOur study showed that the hospital and online museum are appropriate and accessible environments for an exhibition for ABL. A varied selection of artworks might contribute most to a meaningful experience. Furthermore, we identified the patients' need for a person-centered approach in ABL in palliative care, in which not only the facilitator, but also health care professionals play an important role.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.