Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41701645›Full record

ReviewJournal of medicinal chemistry2026

Thermodynamic Data Remain a Hot Tip for Decoding Binding Affinity and Water Impact on Protein-Ligand Complex Formation to Assist Lead Optimization.

Gerhard Klebe

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of medicinal chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Gerhard KlebeInstitute of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Philipps University Marburg, Marbacher Weg 6, Marburg 35032, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4913-390X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Optimization of screening hits from lead-finding campaigns into promising lead candidates can be supported by factorizing thermodynamic binding profiles into enthalpic and entropic contributions. Given that data are recorded for large multicomponent systems, typically affected by substantial enthalpy/entropy compensation, it is exceedingly challenging to directly assign enthalpy and entropy to rational design concepts. Correcting recorded data for superimposed protonation steps and analyzing structural and dynamic properties is essential. Subsequently, thermodynamic signatures can be assigned to related ligand pairs. However, profile-determining contributions can vary from case-to-case, even steps prior to protein binding can be determinant. Pocket solvation, prior to or during ligand binding, can have substantial influence on binding profiles, leading to more enthalpy or entropy-driven profiles. Since a range from dry to well-solvated pockets is observed, different thermodynamic signatures can be recorded. The quality of newly formed surface-solvation shells generated after ligand binding can significantly impact ligand affinity.

Identifiers

PMID41701645
PMCPMC12951438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.