ReviewJournal of medicinal chemistry2026
Thermodynamic Data Remain a Hot Tip for Decoding Binding Affinity and Water Impact on Protein-Ligand Complex Formation to Assist Lead Optimization.
Review in Journal of medicinal chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Role of Water in Protein-Ligand Binding: Decisive Factor, Annoying Feature, or Indispensable Control Element: In Any Case, a Major Challenge.ChemMedChem · 2026Article
- Molecular and structural insights into carvacrol and thymol alkylated derivatives targeting WSSV and AHPND-causing Vibrio parahaemolyticus.Archives of microbiology · 2026Article
- Integrating network toxicology with multi-omics approaches to elucidate molecular targets and pathway mechanisms in BPA-induced hepatocellular carcinoma.Molecular diversity · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Optimization of screening hits from lead-finding campaigns into promising lead candidates can be supported by factorizing thermodynamic binding profiles into enthalpic and entropic contributions. Given that data are recorded for large multicomponent systems, typically affected by substantial enthalpy/entropy compensation, it is exceedingly challenging to directly assign enthalpy and entropy to rational design concepts. Correcting recorded data for superimposed protonation steps and analyzing structural and dynamic properties is essential. Subsequently, thermodynamic signatures can be assigned to related ligand pairs. However, profile-determining contributions can vary from case-to-case, even steps prior to protein binding can be determinant. Pocket solvation, prior to or during ligand binding, can have substantial influence on binding profiles, leading to more enthalpy or entropy-driven profiles. Since a range from dry to well-solvated pockets is observed, different thermodynamic signatures can be recorded. The quality of newly formed surface-solvation shells generated after ligand binding can significantly impact ligand affinity.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.