Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41701557›Full record

ArticleHuman reproduction (Oxford, England)2026

Second report of registry of the International Society of Uterus Transplantation (ISUTx): international activities 2000-2024.

Mats Brännström, Catherine Racowsky, Johanna Wiik, Stefan G Tullius, Rebecca Deans, Paige M Porrett, Wellington Andraus, Tan Hak Koon, Francisco Carmona, Randa Akouri and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human reproduction (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Uterus transplantation: an ethical analysis.Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Mats BrännströmDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Göteborg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-6081-9101
Catherine RacowskyDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8961-7896
Johanna WiikDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Göteborg, Sweden.
Stefan G TulliusDivision of Transplant Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Rebecca DeansRoyal Hospital for Women, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Paige M PorrettDepartment of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Wellington AndrausDigestive Organs Transplant Division, Gastroenterology Department, University of São Paulo School of Medicine FM-USP, São Paulo, Brazil.
Tan Hak KoonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Francisco CarmonaInstitute Clinic of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Neonatology, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Institut dÍnvestigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Randa AkouriDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Göteborg, Sweden.
Paolo ScolloDivision of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Maternal and Child Department, Cannizzaro Hospital, Catania, Italy.
Smit SolankiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Kidney Diseases and Research Center, Dr. H.L. Trivedi Institute of Transplantation Sciences, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.
Padmapriya VivekDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gleneagles Global Health City, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
J Richard SmithWest London Gynaecological Cancer Centre, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College, London, UK.
Shailesh P PuntambekarDepartment of Surgery, Galaxy Care Multi-Speciality Hospital, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Sung Eun KimDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Ömer ÖzkanDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Akdeniz University Faculty of Medicine, Antalya, Turkey.
Jean-Marc AyoubiDepartment of Gynecology, Foch Hospital, Suresnes, France.
Jiri FronekDepartment of Transplantation Surgery, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic.
Sara Y BruckerDepartment of Women's Health, University Hospital of Obstetrics and Gynecology Tubingen, Eberhard Karls University, Tubingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5162-1542

Funding

Jane and Dan Olsson Foundation 2024-11Swedish Research Council 2024-03487
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

study questionWhat have been the activities, characteristics, and outcomes of uterus transplantation (UTx) performed worldwide from 2000 through 2024? SUMMARY ANSWER: In 91 UTx cases, 67 involved live donors and 80 of the recipients had Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome, with 12-month graft survival of 74%, enabling pregnancy attempts that yielded 44 healthy singleton deliveries with a live birth rate per embryo transfer of 30.3%. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: UTx is the only treatment for women with absolute uterine factor infertility who wish to carry a pregnancy. According to a comprehensive report including data up to 2020 on 45 UTx cases, 19 live births occurred (35.8% per embryo transfer) at a mean of 35.3 weeks gestation. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Data were extracted from the web-based registry of the International Society of Uterus Transplantation (ISUTx). This registry captures information on donor and recipient characteristics, transplantation procedures, postoperative complications, immunosuppression, complications including rejections, and reproductive outcome. Analyses were undertaken of the 91 transplants performed between 6 April 2000 and 31 December 2024, that were recorded in the registry. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING,

methodsTwenty-four medical centers in five continents registered their uterus transplants by entering data from the day of transplantation until 3 months after graft removal. The following variables were assessed: the demographic and laboratory characteristics of donors and recipients, the source of graft (live versus deceased donor), surgical specifics including technique, duration, ischemic times, and post-op complications, immunosuppression, rejection data, pregnancy with live birth(s), and hysterectomy. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: In 91 uterus transplantations (67 from live donors, 24 from deceased donors), the overall surgical success rate, defined as graft viability by 12 months, was 75%. Most recipients (88%) had Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome, with mothers being the most frequent (64%) live donors. Live donor hysterectomies were performed by laparotomy (54%), robotics (28%), or laparoscopy (18%). Total ischemic time was shorter in live- versus deceased-donor UTx procedures. Rejection episodes that were treated with escalations of immunosuppression were more frequent during months 1-5 (44%) than during months 6-10 (28%) post-UTx. Graft survival during the first 12 months was superior when grafts from premenopausal donors were used as compared to from postmenopausal donors. Forty-four singleton live births (mean gestational length of 34.5 weeks), including eight second births, were reported, with a live birth rate per embryo transfer of 30%. Preeclampsia was the most common pregnancy complication, occurring in 23% of live-birth pregnancies. Major postnatal complications occurred in 11 infants, 9 with respiratory distress syndrome; no major malformations were observed. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Data in the registry are self-reported and not subjected to validation. Although the ISUTx registry represents the most comprehensive quality registry of UTx activity in the world, cases from at least four centers are excluded as they were not entered into the registry. Birth outcomes from some registry cases are as yet unknown as these ongoing cases have not yet reached the endpoint of hysterectomy. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE

findingsThis study presents the most comprehensive analysis to date of UTx, the only fertility treatment for absolute uterine factor infertility. The registry serves as the prime source for quality assessment and process improvement in UTx. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): The establishment and operation of the registry were funded by the Swedish Research Council (2024-03487 to M.B.) and Jane and Dan Olsson Foundation (2024-11 to M.B.). There was no competing interest. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Not applicable.

Indexed as

46, XX Disorders of Sex DevelopmentCongenital AbnormalitiesInfertility, FemaleMullerian DuctsOrgan TransplantationRegistriesUterusAdultFemaleGraft SurvivalHumansLive BirthLiving DonorsPregnancyUterine Didelphysassisted reproductiondonorimmunosuppressioninfertilitylive birthrecipientrejectionsurgerytransplantationuterus

Identifiers

PMID41701557
PMCPMC13061116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.