Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41701555›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2026

Cortical response to balance perturbation is more sensitive in modern dancers than nondancers during biomechanically similar balance recovery.

Kennedy G Kerr, Scott E Boebinger, Jasmine L Mirdamadi, Janna Protzak, Michael R Borich, Lena H Ting

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kennedy G KerrWalace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States.ORCID 0009-0006-8861-5625
Scott E BoebingerWalace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States.
Jasmine L MirdamadiDivision of Physical Therapy, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States.
Janna ProtzakWalace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States.
Michael R BorichWalace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9897-9867
Lena H TingWalace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States.

Funding

Individual-specific engagement of cortical resources for standing balance control in aging and post strokeR01AG072756 · NIA · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Michael Robert Borich, Lena H Ting · 2022 to 2026
$3.0M
Training in Computational Neural EngineeringT32EB025816 · NIBIB · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI Michael Robert Borich, Christopher John Rozell · 2019 to 2026
$1.9M
Neural correlates of whole-body motion perception during balance perturbations in stroke survivors and their relationship to balance functionF32HD105458 · NICHD · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI MIRDAMADI, JASMINE · 2021 to 2022
$134k
HHS | National Institutes of Health (NIH) F32HD105458NIA NIH HHS R01 AG072756NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB025816NICHD NIH HHS F32 HD105458NSF | National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program (GRFP) 1937971
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motor skill expertise can facilitate more automatic movement, engaging less cortical activity while producing appropriate motor output. Accordingly, cortical-evoked error assessment responses to balance perturbations, assessed using electroencephalography (EEG), are smaller in young and older adults with better balance. However, the effect of balance expertise on cortical responses to balance perturbation has not been studied. Using professional modern dancers as balance experts, we compared cortical-evoked responses and biomechanics of the balance-correcting response between modern dancers and nondancers. We hypothesized that balance ability gained through long-term training facilitates more automatic balance control. We predicted modern dancers would have smaller cortical-evoked responses and better balance recovery at an equivalent balance challenge. Support-surface perturbations were scaled to 60% and 140% of individuals' step threshold (ST) to account for individual challenge level, and N1 amplitude was assessed as an initial measure of cortical engagement relating to balance error assessment. In contrast to our prediction, dancers exhibited larger N1 responses compared with nondancers while demonstrating similar biomechanical responses, suggesting dancers have greater cortical sensitivity to balance perturbations. Furthermore, in dancers, modulation of N1 responses across perturbation magnitudes scaled to differences in objective task difficulty. In contrast, nondancer N1 responses were modulated as a function of intersubject differences in N1 amplitude, potentially reflecting individual balance challenge. Our findings suggest that modern dance training increases the sensitivity of the initial, cortical N1 response to balance perturbation, supporting postural alignment to an objective reference. Differences in balance-error processing may thus be altered with specific long-term training, with implications for rehabilitation.

Indexed as

Cerebral CortexDancingEvoked PotentialsPostural BalanceAdultBiomechanical PhenomenaElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMaleYoung Adultbalance controlbiomechanicsdanceelectroencephalographyexpertise

Identifiers

PMID41701555
PMCPMC13077945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.