ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2026
Cortical response to balance perturbation is more sensitive in modern dancers than nondancers during biomechanically similar balance recovery.
Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Motor skill expertise can facilitate more automatic movement, engaging less cortical activity while producing appropriate motor output. Accordingly, cortical-evoked error assessment responses to balance perturbations, assessed using electroencephalography (EEG), are smaller in young and older adults with better balance. However, the effect of balance expertise on cortical responses to balance perturbation has not been studied. Using professional modern dancers as balance experts, we compared cortical-evoked responses and biomechanics of the balance-correcting response between modern dancers and nondancers. We hypothesized that balance ability gained through long-term training facilitates more automatic balance control. We predicted modern dancers would have smaller cortical-evoked responses and better balance recovery at an equivalent balance challenge. Support-surface perturbations were scaled to 60% and 140% of individuals' step threshold (ST) to account for individual challenge level, and N1 amplitude was assessed as an initial measure of cortical engagement relating to balance error assessment. In contrast to our prediction, dancers exhibited larger N1 responses compared with nondancers while demonstrating similar biomechanical responses, suggesting dancers have greater cortical sensitivity to balance perturbations. Furthermore, in dancers, modulation of N1 responses across perturbation magnitudes scaled to differences in objective task difficulty. In contrast, nondancer N1 responses were modulated as a function of intersubject differences in N1 amplitude, potentially reflecting individual balance challenge. Our findings suggest that modern dance training increases the sensitivity of the initial, cortical N1 response to balance perturbation, supporting postural alignment to an objective reference. Differences in balance-error processing may thus be altered with specific long-term training, with implications for rehabilitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.