Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41701498›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2026

Sessile Serrated Lesion Detection Rate and Colorectal Cancer Risk and Mortality.

Edward S Huang, Qiwen Huang, Pragati Kenkare, Satish Mudiganti, Meghan C Martinez, Scarlett Lin Gomez, Su-Ying Liang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Optimizing detection and resection of colorectal polyps.Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Edward S HuangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Palo Alto Medical Foundation, Sutter Health, San Jose, California.
Qiwen HuangCenter for Health Systems Research, Sutter Health, Palo Alto, California.
Pragati KenkareCenter for Health Systems Research, Sutter Health, Palo Alto, California.
Satish MudigantiCenter for Health Systems Research, Sutter Health, Walnut Creek, California.
Meghan C MartinezCenter for Health Systems Research, Sutter Health, Palo Alto, California.
Scarlett Lin GomezDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco.
Su-Ying LiangCenter for Health Systems Research, Sutter Health, Palo Alto, California.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Although the adenoma detection rate is a key colonoscopy quality metric, benchmarks for serrated polyp removal, specifically the sessile serrated lesion detection rate (SSLDR), are currently lacking. Objective: To evaluate the physician SSLDR and the risk of postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer (PCCRC) and related mortality. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study was conducted between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2021, within a large integrated health care system in Northern California and included colonoscopies performed for patients aged 18 years or older, without a diagnosis of colorectal cancer within 6 months of colonoscopy, history of colorectal cancer, or history of inflammatory bowel disease by 50 gastroenterologists. Statistical analysis was performed from January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2021. Exposure: The primary exposure was the SSLDR, defined as the proportion of screening colonoscopies with at least 1 histologically confirmed sessile serrated adenoma or traditional serrated adenoma, categorized into quartiles. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was PCCRC diagnosed more than 6 months after negative colonoscopy results. Secondary outcomes included proximal or distal PCCRC, advanced stage colorectal cancer, all-cause mortality, and colorectal cancer-related mortality. Outcomes were ascertained through linked state and institutional cancer registries and vital records. Results: Among 328 416 colonoscopies performed for 226 695 unique patients (mean [SD] age, 58.6 [10.7] years; 51.7% women), 562 PCCRC cases were identified over 2 038 816 person-years of follow-up. The absolute PCCRC incidence rate decreased with higher SSLDR quartiles, from 3.9 cases per 10 000 person-years in the lowest quartile to 2.4 cases per 10 000 person-years in the highest quartile. Compared with patients in the lowest SSLDR quartile, those in the highest SSLDR quartile had a significantly lower risk of PCCRC (multivariate hazard ratio, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.50-0.94; P = .01 for trend), primarily associated with lower risk of proximal PCCRC. A higher SSLDR was associated with lower all-cause mortality (second quartile, 57.7 deaths per 10 000 person-years; third quartile, 58.0 deaths per 10 000 person-years) and colorectal cancer-related mortality (second quartile, 0.2 deaths per 10 000 person-years; third quartile, 0.2 deaths per 10 000 person-years) in the second and third SSLDR quartiles, but the association was not significant in the highest quartile compared with the lowest quartile. Conclusions and Relevance: In this large community-based cohort study, a higher physician SSLDR was associated with a significantly lower risk of PCCRC in a dose-dependent manner. These findings support using the SSLDR as a crucial quality metric for colonoscopy.

Indexed as

Colonic PolypsColonoscopyColorectal NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerAdenomaAgedCaliforniaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQuality Indicators, Health CareRetrospective StudiesRisk Assessment

Identifiers

PMID41701498
PMCPMC12914494

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.