ArticleJAMA network open2026
Parental Ability to Identify Severe Illnesses in Their Children.
Article in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Early parental recognition of severe illness in children and adolescents is crucial for timely management and improved outcomes in pediatric emergency care. Objective: To assess how accurately parents can identify severe illness in their children using a questionnaire completed shortly after arrival at the emergency department (ED). Design, Setting, and Participants: This diagnostic study was conducted in a tertiary pediatric ED in northern Finland. Data were collected in 2019 to 2021, and this analysis was conducted in May 2024 to May 2025. Children and adolescents whose parents completed the questionnaire before physician assessment were included. Exposures: A structured, 36-item parental questionnaire assessing symptoms and the child or adolescent's overall condition. Main Outcomes and Measures: Severe illness was defined as 1 or more of the following: admission to the pediatric intensive care unit, hospital treatment of more than 24 hours, need for intravenous or nasogastric fluids, need for intravenous antibiotics for more than 24 hours, oxygen saturation less than 93% or the need for inhaled medications, anaphylactic shock, intoxication requiring hospital admission, or surgical intervention. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated for each question. To identify parental triage questions with the strongest diagnostic value, a machine learning analysis was conducted. Results: Among 2375 included children and adolescents (mean [SD] age, 5.4 [4.6] years; 1140 female [48.0%]), 567 individuals (23.9%) met criteria for severe illness. Moderate to high parental worry showed the highest sensitivity (91.0% [95% CI, 88.3%-93.2%]) but the lowest specificity (17.5% [95% CI, 15.8%-19.4%]). Other specific pediatric questions demonstrated modest diagnostic accuracy with limited additional value. The machine learning model (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.65-0.77) identified parental worry (feature importance score, 0.047), parent assessments of child or adolescent's general condition (feature importance score, 0.046), and need for treatment (feature importance score, 0.141) as the strongest predictors of hospital admission. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, parental worry identified most cases of severe illness but had low specificity. These findings suggest that while parental concern may serve as an initial screening indicator, it should be complemented by clinical evaluation and objective measures to avoid unnecessary escalation of care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.