ArticleApplied health economics and health policy2026
Ensuring Epidemiological Consistency in Risk-Stratified Cancer Screening Models: A Novel Approach Based on Flemish Breast Cancer Screening.
Article in Applied health economics and health policy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveWe present a novel dynamic risk-stratified breast cancer screening Markov model designed to maintain robust and epidemiologically consistent cancer prevalences, regardless of the number or composition of risk-stratification groups. This approach addresses a common limitation in existing models, where altering risk-group definitions or proportions can unintentionally distort overall incidence rates. By overcoming this constraint, the method lowers barriers to developing interactive, flexible and policy-relevant models that can be shared directly with decision makers. The paper serves as both a methodological contribution and a practical guide for implementation.
methodsOur approach combines conditional transition probabilities with pre-stratified 'at-risk' states within a conventional Markov cohort framework. Lifetime risk is determined at the structural level, while the timing of onset is governed by age-specific conditional probabilities. These components are derived directly from Flemish cancer registry data, enabling close alignment with the target population and facilitating epidemiological validation.
resultsWe validate the model against empirical breast cancer incidence data from Flanders, comparing predicted outcomes across age bands and cancer stages. The method consistently reproduces observed incidence patterns without additional calibration, maintaining stability when risk group definitions or sizes are varied.
conclusionsCombining pre-stratified 'at-risk' states with conditional transition probabilities offers a simple yet powerful means of achieving epidemiological consistency in both risk-stratified and non-stratified cancer screening models. The method is data driven, transparent, and adaptable to different cancers or screening contexts, making it especially valuable for interactive models intended for use by policymakers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41701471What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.