ArticleFish physiology and biochemistry2026
Effects of duration of a plant-based diet stimulus at first feeding on nutritional programming in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar).
Article in Fish physiology and biochemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nutritional programming could potentially be a strategy for sustainable aquaculture to adapt fish to feeds formulated with low levels of marine ingredients. The present study examined the effects of early dietary stimulus duration and the impacts of a later challenge with a similar diet. At first feeding, Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) fry of ~ 0.15 g initial weight were fed a vegetable diet (77% plant-based ingredients) for either 1 (V1) or 2 weeks (V2), while a control group (M) received a marine diet (86% marine-based ingredients) for the 2 weeks (stimulus phase). All fish then received a marine diet for 16 weeks (intermediate phase) before being refed a vegetable diet for 6 weeks (challenge phase). Water temperature was 13 °C during the trial, and the only difference between the three experimental groups (V1, V2 and M) was their dietary regime during the first 2 weeks. Obviously, stimulus duration had no phenotypic impacts on growth or tissue fatty acid compositions of either total or polar lipids after challenge. However, the expressions of key genes of LC-PUFA biosynthesis were upregulated significantly in the V1 group, whereas the expressions of most transcription factors were downregulated in the V2 group. After the challenge, the circular muscle thickness of the intestine in the V1 group was increased by 15%, and goblet cell numbers were reduced by 15%. Overall, further investigations about the duration of the stimulus and assessment with longer challenges are required to elicit positive effects and to refine the use of nutritional programming in Atlantic salmon.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.