ReviewClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society2026
Antithrombotic therapy for cancer-associated venous thromboembolism.
Review in Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Antithrombotic Therapy in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Cervical Skip Metastases and Extensive Central Venous Thrombosis as the Initial Presentation of High-Grade Prostate Adenocarcinoma With Discordant PI-RADS 3 Findings: A Case Report and Diagnostic Challenge.Clinical case reports · 2026Article
- Antithrombotic Therapy in Primary and Secondary Prevention of Coronary Artery Disease.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE) is one of the most frequent and life-threatening complications in oncology, representing the second leading cause of death in patients with malignancy. Its pathogenesis is multifactorial, driven by tumor-specific procoagulant activity, systemic inflammation, and the prothrombotic effects of anticancer therapies. The risk is particularly high in pancreatic, gastric, cerebral, and pulmonary cancers and is further amplified by advanced disease stage, comorbidities, and treatment-related factors. Management of cancer-associated VTE requires a careful balance between the risks of thrombosis and bleeding. Low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) were long considered the standard of care, based on superior efficacy over vitamin K antagonists. More recently, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have emerged as effective alternatives, offering the convenience of oral administration and comparable efficacy. However, increased rates of gastrointestinal and genitourinary bleeding, drug-drug interactions, and challenges in patients with renal dysfunction or thrombocytopenia complicate their use. Current international guidelines recommend both LMWHs and DOACs as first-line options, with agent selection guided by tumor type, bleeding risk, comorbidities, and patient preference. Despite these advances, unmet needs persist, including recurrent thrombosis despite anticoagulation, management in thrombocytopenic patients, and adherence to prolonged LMWH therapy. Novel strategies, particularly inhibition of coagulation factor XI, hold promise for dissociating antithrombotic efficacy from bleeding risk. Ongoing phase 3 trials of abelacimab may provide critical evidence to refine anticoagulation strategies in patients with complex clinical profiles. Cancer-associated VTE remains a major clinical challenge requiring individualized decision-making and continuous reassessment. Emerging therapies may further improve outcomes in this vulnerable population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41701347What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.