ReviewPathologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2026
[Brain dissection in general pathology : Practical recommendations from a neuropathological perspective].
Review in Pathologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSince neuropathology departments in Germany are mainly located only at university hospitals, brain sections are frequently performed by general pathologists. This article provides practical recommendations for a structured approach and highlights situations in which neuropathological consultation is advisable.
methodsThe recommendations are based on established procedures, current literature, and personal professional experience. They are intended as a practical guide rather than a formal guideline.
resultsKey steps for removal, fixation, and sectioning as well as interpretation of the findings are described. Hereby, the importance of clinical information and of a systematic assessment of macroscopic and histological changes is emphasized. Furthermore, typical situations are described in which neuropathological expertise is recommended. DISCUSSION: A structured brain section enhances the overall quality of the autopsy. It enables a valid integration of cerebral changes into a broader context. Close collaboration between pathology and neuropathology is essential and beneficial for both sides.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41701333What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.