Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41701313›Full record

ArticleStrahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]2026

Deep learning-based prediction of interfractional anatomic variations in prostate cancer radiotherapy.

Javad Derougar, Ahmad Mostaar, Reza Jaferyan

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al], 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Javad DerougarDepartment of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Ahmad MostaarDepartment of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. mostaar@sbmu.ac.ir.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4450-1005
Reza JaferyanDepartment of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeInterfractional prostate displacement challenges the accuracy of the delivered dose during radiotherapy treatment. Variation in bladder volume is a key driver of this movement. A deep learning (DL) model was developed to predict daily megavoltage computed tomography (MVCT) based on bladder volume and treatment fraction, enabling patient-specific anatomic estimation in prostate radiotherapy.

methodsThis retrospective study analyzed 700 MVCT scans from prostate cancer patients treated with tomotherapy. The bladder was manually contoured on all MVCT scans, and its volume was calculated. A customized three-dimensional (3D) U‑Net model was trained to generate synthetic MVCT images using the kilovoltage computed tomography (KVCT), bladder volume, and fraction number as inputs. The model's performance was evaluated with data from 84 held-out MVCTs, using image similarity metrics including structural similarity index (SSIM), normalized cross-correlation (NCC), Dice similarity coefficient (Dice), mean absolute error (MAE), and mean squared error (MSE). Additionally, anatomic accuracy was assessed for bladder and prostate contours, applying the Dice similarity and MSD.

resultsThe model demonstrated accurate MVCT predictions, evidenced by a mean SSIM ranging from 0.76 to 0.80, NCC from 0.84 to 0.89, a Dice of 0.97, and MAE and MSE values between 0.05 and 0.06 and 0.010 and 0.014, respectively. The predicted anatomy enabled bladder contouring with a mean Dice of 0.83 and mean surface distance (MSD) of 1.64 mm and prostate contouring with a mean Dice of 0.92 and MSD of 0.48 mm. Changes in bladder volume showed moderate correlation with bladder Dice, with a correlation coefficient (r = -0.50), and with MSD (r = 0.64), while the prostate contour metrics exhibited weak correlations.

conclusionThe proposed deep learning (DL) framework demonstrated promising capabilities for anatomic prediction and contour generation using noninvasive input features. Within the context of helical radiotherapy delivered on a Radixact X9 system (Accuray Inc., Madison, WI, USA), where daily MVCT acquisition is standard practice, this approach provides a patient-specific method for estimating the anatomic configuration on the day of treatment based on the planning KVCT and bladder volume information.

Indexed as

Anatomic VariationDeep LearningProstatic NeoplasmsRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedUrinary BladderDose Fractionation, RadiationHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedBladder volumeDeep learningInterfractional motionMegavoltage computed tomographyProstate neoplasms

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.