ArticleTropical animal health and production2026
Early immunogenic response to intradermal, subcutaneous, and intramuscular rabies vaccination in cattle and buffaloes: a field study.
Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rabies is a fatal zoonotic disease of major global health significance and continues to cause substantial economic losses in livestock in endemic regions, particularly in countries like India where surveillance and reporting remain limited. Preventive vaccination is the most effective means of reducing bovine rabies risk; however, practical considerations such as dose optimization and administration route require further evaluation under field conditions. This study assessed the early humoral immune response to post-exposure rabies vaccination delivered through different routes in cattle and buffaloes on four farms in Punjab, India. A total of 40 bovines were enrolled and allocated into four vaccination groups: cattle vaccinated subcutaneously (SC, 1 mL), buffaloes vaccinated intradermally (ID, 0.2 mL), cattle vaccinated with a low-dose ID regimen (0.1 mL), and buffaloes vaccinated intramuscularly (IM, 1 mL). All animals received a five-dose regimen on days 0, 3, 7, 14, and 28. Serum samples collected on day 28 were analysed for virus-neutralizing antibodies using the Rapid Fluorescent Focus Inhibition Test (RFFIT). Antibody titers differed significantly among vaccination groups (Kruskal–Wallis, p < 0.0001). The 0.1 mL intradermal regimen in cattle (Group 3) elicited the highest immune responses (median 32 IU/mL), which were significantly greater than those observed in cattle receiving subcutaneous vaccination and buffaloes receiving intradermal or intramuscular regimens (p < 0.01). Buffaloes vaccinated intramuscularly (Group 4) showed moderate titers (median 16 IU/mL) and responded significantly better than buffaloes vaccinated intradermally (Group 2) (p < 0.05). Pre-immune controls remained uniformly low, validating the study design. Overall, the reduced-dose intradermal vaccination strategy in cattle outperformed conventional routes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41701247What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.