ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2026
Uncertainty-Aware Training for Ophthalmic Segmentation Using MedSAM.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Uncertainty quantification (UQ) has been applied to deep learning (DL) models to enhance not only their interpretability, but to guide model learning. This work presents Uncertainty-Aware Training (UAT), which generates uncertainty maps at train time and augments the loss function with them to allow the models to concentrate on areas of high uncertainty during learning. By highlighting uncertain pixels as requiring more scrutiny, model performance is enhanced on three ophthalmic segmentation tasks. Methods: We applied UAT to three ophthalmic segmentation, or pixel-level classification, tasks: geographic atrophy (GA), optic cup (OC), and foveal avascular zone (FAZ). UAT weighs the loss function binary cross-entropy according to uncertainty, forcing the model to focus on ambiguous areas. We experimented with output-based UQ methods, such as entropy, and post -hoc techniques like conformal prediction. UAT was evaluated on a state-of-the-art foundational model fine-tuned for these specific segmentation tasks. Results: The addition of an entropy-weighing map at loss calculation time consistently improved model performance across all three datasets, with conformal prediction using the Least Ambiguous Set-Valued Classifier version also achieving higher overall performance for GA and OC segmentation. The easy-to-integrate implementation of UAT proved feasible without significant training structure modifications. Conclusions: UAT enhances DL model performance and interpretability by focusing on uncertainty in addition to error, improving segmentation accuracy. Translational Relevance: UAT uses interpretable uncertainty maps to enhance DL segmentation performance. Its lightweight integration makes it practical for adoption and leads to improved model performance on ophthalmic segmentation tasks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.