ReviewBiochemical Society transactions2026
Human iPSCs: atrial versus ventricular cardiomyocytes and their functional and pharmacological differences.
Review in Biochemical Society transactions, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- mRNA-Lipid Nanoparticle-Mediated Reprogramming and Standard Sendai Virus Reprogramming: Generation of iPSCs and iPSC-Derived Cardiomyocytes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The continuing development and characterisation of human-induced pluripotent stem cell (hiPSC)-derived cell-types has opened up a virtually endless source of human, physiologically relevant cells, available at scale, for scientific research. The technology's maturation and refinement have allowed additional cell-types and sub-types to become available. The first step in adopting these novel cell-types is to properly characterise these cells and compare how they perform against the longer-established cell-types. Parallel to the progress in iPSC-derived cells has been the great strides in the platforms developed to assess and analyse the characteristics and functions of cells. These improved platforms have greatly increased the range, throughput and quality of the functional data that can be obtained from cell-types, including iPSC-derived cells. Research into cardiomyocytes in particular has been greatly enhanced by these platforms as cardiomyocytes not only have the expected cellular markers, proteomics and transcriptomics but are also electrically active and capable of contracting, opening a wide vista of potential assays. If human iPSC-derived cardiomyocytes are to confidently replace and supplement the existing animal and cellular models of the heart, it has to be demonstrated that they correctly replicate (or even improve) upon the functions and pharmacology of the existing heart models used on these new and improved platforms. Therefore, this review compares the functional and pharmacological differences seen between Axol's human iPSC-derived atrial and ventricular cardiomyocyte cells on a range of established and newer platforms demonstrating the advantages of using chamber-specific human iPSC-derived cardiomyocytes and discussing how their use could supplement these emerging techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.