ArticleFEMS microbiology letters2026
Negative-control-anchored urinary microbiome profiling with absolute 16S quantification: a pilot study in newly diagnosed, treatment-naive bladder cancer and healthy individuals.
Article in FEMS microbiology letters, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recent studies utilizing 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing have challenged the notion of urine sterility, yet urine is a low-biomass specimen in which apparent community profiles can be strongly influenced by background signal from reagents and processing. To address this interpretability gap, we integrate culture-independent absolute 16S rRNA gene quantification with urinary 16S amplicon sequencing in a negative-control-anchored workflow. Bacterial load provides a biomass-aware quality control gate that defines interpretable low-biomass thresholds and objective exclusion criteria. As a pilot application, we compared midstream urine collected prior to instrumentation from healthy volunteers and newly diagnosed bladder cancer (BC) patients, quality filtering retained 29 controls and 5 BC cases. Samples > 106 copies/ml typically produced > 10 000 reads; near 105 copies/ml read counts dropped sharply yet remained distinguishable from background. Thirteen negative controls (V3-V4 PCR and stabilization buffer; median 90, mean 124 reads) supported excluding samples with < 1000 reads. Median bacterial load was lower in BC than in controls (7.0 × 103 vs 1.07 × 106 copies/ml), although not significant in this underpowered cohort (P = 0.07). This cohort-size-independent framework enables load-based triage for sequencing, reduces background-driven over-interpretation in low-biomass urine datasets, and supports modeling bacterial load as a covariate or stratifier in future studies of the bladder cancer microbiome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.