Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41700649›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics2026

Strengthening health system capacity for legal termination of pregnancy in Burkina Faso: A quasi-experimental evaluation in public health facilities.

Rachidatou Compaoré, Danielle Belemsaga Yugbaré, Siaka Lougué, Abdoul Aziz Kinda, Kadari Cissé, Relwendé Nacanabo, Souleymane Bandaogo, Henri Gautier Ouedraogo, Seni Kouanda

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Rachidatou CompaoréBiomedical and Public Health, Institut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé (IRSS/CNRST), Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7456-8593
Danielle Belemsaga YugbaréBiomedical and Public Health, Institut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé (IRSS/CNRST), Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
Siaka LouguéBiomedical and Public Health, Institut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé (IRSS/CNRST), Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
Abdoul Aziz KindaBiomedical and Public Health, Institut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé (IRSS/CNRST), Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
Kadari CisséBiomedical and Public Health, Institut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé (IRSS/CNRST), Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
Relwendé NacanaboBiomedical and Public Health, Institut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé (IRSS/CNRST), Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
Souleymane BandaogoBiomedical and Public Health, Institut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé (IRSS/CNRST), Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
Henri Gautier OuedraogoBiomedical and Public Health, Institut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé (IRSS/CNRST), Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
Seni KouandaBiomedical and Public Health, Institut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé (IRSS/CNRST), Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.

Funding

Anonymous donnors
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveDespite legal provisions allowing access to safe abortion under specific criteria in Burkina Faso, the availability of care services remains limited. The present study evaluated the effectiveness of interventions aimed at strengthening health services' capacity to provide legal termination of pregnancy in Burkina Faso.

methodsWe conducted a quasi-experimental "before-after" study without a control group across 179 public health facilities comprising 132 primary healthcare facilities (CSPS/CM) and 47 referral hospitals. We used data from the Harmonized Health Facility Assessment (HHFA) survey conducted in 2020 as the baseline, and the endline survey was performed in December 2022 using CSPRO electronic questionnaires. We evaluated the availability and provision of legal termination of pregnancy services using the McNemar and Wilcoxon tests (Stata 18), with statistical significance set at p < 0.05.

resultsService availability for the legal termination of pregnancy showed significant improvements from 2020, with notable changes in service delivery patterns across all levels. In primary healthcare facilities (CSPS/CM), misoprostol utilization increased substantially from 28.6% to 95.2% (p = 0.0455), while manual vacuum aspiration availability improved from 28.6% to 100% (p = 0.0455). Patient referrals from the CSPS/CM increased markedly from 1.5% to 97.4% (p < 0.0001). At the hospital level, although legally authorized abortion services decreased from 100% to 76.6% (p = 0.0009), post-abortion family planning coverage improved from 89.4% to 100% (p = 0.0253). Hospital referrals increased significantly from 10.6% to 51.2% (p < 0.0001), whereas misoprostol usage remained stable at approximately 83%.

conclusionThe findings indicated a substantial shift in the legal termination of pregnancy delivery patterns and strengthened referral networks between different levels of care. These changes suggest the successful strengthening of the health system's capability to provide comprehensive abortion care services.

Indexed as

Abortion, LegalHealth FacilitiesHealth Services AccessibilityAbortifacient Agents, NonsteroidalBurkina FasoFemaleHumansMisoprostolPregnancyPrimary Health CareSurveys and QuestionnairesAbortifacient Agents, NonsteroidalMisoprostolBurkina Fasohealth facility assessmentlegal termination of pregnancyreadinesssafe abortion care

Identifiers

PMID41700649
PMCPMC13377279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.