Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41700531›Full record

Observational studyAddiction (Abingdon, England)2026

The association between gambling frequency and risk of harm: Analysis using health survey data from England and Scotland.

Esther Moore, Robert Pryce, Hazel Squires, Elizabeth Goyder

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Esther MooreSheffield Centre for Health and Related Research (SCHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8533-690X
Robert PryceSheffield Centre for Health and Related Research (SCHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4853-0719
Hazel SquiresSheffield Centre for Health and Related Research (SCHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2776-4014
Elizabeth GoyderSheffield Centre for Health and Related Research (SCHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.

Funding

University of Sheffield and the Wellcome Trust 218462/Z/19/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsHealth economic models can be used to assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of public health policies for gambling. To develop such a model, we must understand how gambling behaviour is associated with risk of experiencing gambling-related harms. This study aimed to: (1) assess the strength of association between gambling frequency and the risk of gambling-related harm and to examine how these associations differ when lottery-only players are excluded; (2) apply the study's findings in a hypothetical policy model aimed at reducing gambling frequency.

designObservational study using six waves of cross-sectional data from the Health Survey for England and the Scottish Health Survey.

settingSurvey conducted in England in 2015, 2016 and 2018 and Scotland in 2015, 2016 and 2017.

participantsThe sample included 16 648 adults (aged 18 and over) who reported gambling in the past year, generally representative of the populations of England and Scotland. MEASUREMENTS: Gambling frequency was measured using 6 categories which indicated frequency in the past 12 months: (a) 2 or more times a week; (b) once a week; (c) less than once a week, more than once a month; (d) once a month; (e) every 2-3 months; (f) once or twice a year. Risk of gambling-related harm was assessed using Problem Gambling Severity Index (PGSI) score (0-27) and its four categories: no-risk (0), low-risk (1-2), moderate-risk (3-7) and high-risk (≥8). Control variables included age, sex, deprivation, social grade, presence of mental disorder and frequency of drinking alcohol.

findingsUsing multinomial logistic regression and zero-inflated negative binomial models we found that gambling at least twice weekly was associated with a statistically significantly higher PGSI score than gambling once or twice a year (incidence rate ratio = 3.528, 95% confidence interval = 2.040-6.103, P value < 0.001). Reducing gambling to guideline levels for people gambling at least twice weekly moved 10% of the sub-sample from higher PGSI categories (low, medium and high risk) to the no-risk category and shifted the distribution of PGSI scores down.

conclusionsThere appears to be a statistically significant association between gambling frequency and risk of gambling-related harm. Data derived from this and similar analyses can be used to model gambling policies which impact gambling frequency.

Indexed as

GamblingAdolescentAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesEnglandFemaleHealth SurveysHumansMaleMiddle AgedRisk FactorsScotlandYoung Adultgamblinggambling frequencygambling‐related harmProblem Gambling Severity Indexpublic healthrisk of harm

Identifiers

PMID41700531
PMCPMC13155269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.