ArticleTurkish journal of surgery2026
Surgical outcomes of laparoscopic and open appendectomy in pregnant patients: A single-center retrospective cohort study.
Article in Turkish journal of surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Acute appendicitis is the most common non-obstetric surgical emergency in pregnancy and is associated with increased maternal morbidity and risk of preterm delivery. Diagnostic difficulty rises with advancing gestation, contributing to delayed diagnosis and higher negative appendectomy rates. This retrospective study compared surgical outcomes between laparoscopic and open appendectomy in pregnant patients and assessed trimester-specific trends. Material and Methods: This retrospective single-center cohort study included pregnant patients who underwent appendectomy between June 2020 and December 2023. The final cohort of 50 cases met the inclusion criteria. Primary outcomes were maternal postoperative complications and preterm birth; secondary outcomes included operative time and length of stay (LOS). Continuous variables were non-normally distributed and are summarized as median (range). Group comparisons were performed using the Mann-Whitney U and Fisher's exact tests. Results: Appendectomies were performed during the first (26%), second (60%), and third trimesters (14%). Laparoscopic appendectomy accounted for 48% of cases. Operative time was significantly shorter in the laparoscopic group compared with the open approach (47 vs. 58 minutes, p=0.044). No significant differences were observed in postoperative complications, LOS, or preterm birth. The overall negative appendectomy rate was 8%, increasing to 28.6% in the third trimester, consistent with greater diagnostic difficulty in late gestation. Conclusion: Laparoscopic appendectomy is a safe and feasible option during pregnancy, providing comparable maternal and obstetric outcomes to open surgery while offering shorter operative times. Larger prospective studies are needed to clarify trimester-specific management, particularly in late gestation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.