ArticleCureus2026
Utility of Infrared Thermography in Assessing Synovitis in Rheumatoid Arthritis: An Observational Study.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction There is an unmet need for an objective, cost-effective, and user-friendly tool to assess disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This pilot study explores the utility of infrared thermography (IRT) in evaluating temperature differences between diseased and normal joints, and its correlation with the Disease Activity Score in 28 joints using Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (DAS28-ESR). Methods We recruited 50 RA patients (90% female subjects, mean age 47.7 years, mean disease duration 6.2 years) and 50 age- and sex-matched healthy controls. Clinical disease activity was assessed using DAS28-ESR, and IRT was performed across 28 joints, with mean joint temperature (T mean) compared between groups and correlated with disease activity. Results Of the 1400 diseased joints assessed, 126 were swollen and 297 were tender, with 21 patients (42%) showing high disease activity (mean DAS28-ESR 4.59). T mean was significantly higher in patients with RA than controls across all 28 joints (p<0.05), with a moderate correlation to DAS28-ESR (r=0.646). Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis yielded an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.84, with 83% sensitivity and 73% specificity at a T mean cut-off of 33.45°C. Thermography detected tenosynovitis in two patients, subclinical synovitis in eight patients in clinical remission, and differentiated active from damaged joints in 10 patients. Conclusion IRT is a promising, non-invasive tool for detecting joint inflammation in RA, with the potential to enhance everyday clinical practice by identifying subclinical synovitis, tenosynovitis, and active joints, particularly in resource-limited settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.