ArticleCureus2026
A Case of Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome Complicating a Thoracic Spinal Subdural Hematoma.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) is a clinicoradiological syndrome characterized by acute neurological symptoms such as headache, seizures, altered consciousness, and visual disturbances, along with neuroimaging findings that typically demonstrate vasogenic edema predominantly involving the parieto-occipital regions. Common precipitants include hypertension, renal dysfunction, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, immunosuppressive agents, and perioperative factors; however, PRES in association with spinal hematoma has rarely been reported. A 68-year-old man developed acute back pain while stretching and presented to the emergency department. On initial evaluation, no focal neurological deficits were evident, and he was discharged after adequate analgesia. The following day, he returned with recurrent back pain. Thoracic spine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) demonstrated findings suggestive of a spinal subdural hematoma at T3/4-T5/6, necessitating further inpatient evaluation. After admission, he experienced persistent intense pain accompanied by marked hypertension, with a peak blood pressure of 230/140 mmHg. He subsequently developed generalized seizures associated with headache and visual disturbances. Brain MRI revealed hyperintensity on T2-weighted and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) images predominantly in the bilateral parieto-occipital regions, consistent with PRES. In the intensive care unit, blood pressure was controlled with continuous nicardipine infusion, targeting a systolic blood pressure of ≤160 mmHg and carefully titrating the infusion to avoid a decrease of >50 mmHg within the first hour, and analgesia/sedation was provided with fentanyl and dexmedetomidine, with subsequent resolution of neurological symptoms. He was later transitioned to oral antihypertensive and analgesic medications, with improvement on follow-up imaging. Although PRES complicating spinal hematoma is uncommon, several potential PRES triggers may be involved, including pain-related blood pressure fluctuations, sustained hypertension, renal and fluid balance disturbances, autonomic influences, perioperative factors, cerebrospinal fluid leakage, and cerebral vasospasm. When hypertension and new neurological symptoms, such as headache, visual disturbances, or seizures, occur during the clinical course of spinal hematoma, PRES may be considered, and prompt blood pressure control with brain MRI evaluation may be warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.