ReviewCureus2026
Perioperative Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist Therapy and Postoperative Outcomes in Adult Foot and Ankle Surgery: A Scoping Review.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) are emerging as a cornerstone in the management of type 2 diabetes and obesity. The perioperative implications of GLP-1RAs in orthopaedic surgery are a growing area of interest; however, their effects in patients undergoing foot and ankle surgery remain uncertain. This scoping review aims to map the available evidence on the use of GLP-1RAs in adults undergoing foot and/or ankle surgical procedures. We aim to examine the impact of perioperative GLP-1RA use on postoperative outcomes in adults undergoing foot and/or ankle surgery. We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus from January 2000 to July 2025. We included English-language full-text studies reporting on adult patients receiving GLP-1RAs who underwent foot and/or ankle surgery. Primary outcomes were bone union and early hardware removal after ankle fracture fixation. Secondary outcomes included infection, wound complications, reoperation, and post-traumatic arthritis. This scoping review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA-ScR guidelines and the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) framework for scoping reviews. A total of 102 records were identified, of which 88 remained after duplicate removal and underwent title and abstract screening. Three articles proceeded to full-text review; one was excluded because it investigated semaglutide in patients with chronic ankle instability without surgical intervention. Two retrospective, propensity-matched cohort studies using the TriNetX federated database met the inclusion criteria. Adults with diabetes undergoing tibiotalar, subtalar, or triple arthrodesis were evaluated and a lower overall rate of postoperative pseudarthrosis was reported among GLP-1RA users compared with matched controls (15.9% vs 20.2%; p = 0.0129). Subgroup analyses showed lower pseudarthrosis rates after subtalar fusion and triple arthrodesis in GLP-1RA users, with no significant difference after isolated tibiotalar fusion. Adults undergoing open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of ankle fractures were examined, and patients not receiving GLP-1RAs had a significantly higher 30-day hardware removal rate compared with GLP-1RA users (odds ratio 1.953; 95% confidence interval 1.062-3.591; p = 0.028). Neither study demonstrated an increased risk of postoperative infection or long-term complications in GLP-1RA users. Current literature suggests that perioperative GLP-1RA use is associated with lower rates of pseudarthrosis after hindfoot arthrodesis and a reduced need for early hardware removal after ankle fracture fixation, without an apparent increase in postoperative infection or long-term complications. However, the evidence is limited, heterogeneous, and based solely on two retrospective database analyses with incomplete perioperative detail and potential residual confounding. This scoping review highlights a substantial gap in the literature regarding the use of GLP-1RAs in foot and ankle surgery and underscores the need for robust prospective studies to clarify the perioperative safety and efficacy of GLP-1RAs in adults undergoing foot and ankle surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.