ReviewCureus2026
Understanding How Childhood Obesity Influences Educational Outcomes: A Literature Review.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Bioecological correlates of learning outcomes: testing the moderating role of obesity in academic performance.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Childhood obesity represents one of the most significant public health and educational challenges of the modern era. The prevalence of overweight and obesity among children and adolescents has risen substantially worldwide over recent decades, affecting a large number of young people. In the United Kingdom, childhood obesity remains highly prevalent and is disproportionately concentrated in socioeconomically deprived communities. While cardiometabolic and psychosocial consequences are well established, evidence is accumulating that obesity also compromises neurocognitive development and academic achievement. This link has major implications for lifelong well-being and social mobility. This review was conducted to systematically evaluate contemporary evidence (2015-2025) exploring the relationship between childhood overweight or obesity and academic outcomes, including test performance, grades, attendance, and cognitive function, and to synthesize mechanistic explanations across biological, psychological, and social domains. Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines, PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched for English-language studies from January 2015 to July 2025. Eligible designs included cross-sectional, longitudinal, and interventional studies that measured overweight or obesity via BMI or equivalent anthropometric indices and reported at least one academic or cognitive outcome. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for observational studies and the Cochrane RoB 2.0 tool for randomized trials. Twenty studies (seven cross-sectional, ten longitudinal, and three interventional) met the inclusion criteria. Across diverse contexts, elevated BMI was consistently associated with poorer academic performance. Longitudinal analyses confirmed directionality: persistent overweight predicted slower progress in literacy and numeracy, independent of parental education or socioeconomic status (SES). Proposed mediators included inflammatory neuromodulation, sleep disturbance, stigma, and deprivation. School-based interventions integrating physical activity, nutrition education, and psychosocial support improved engagement and executive function despite modest BMI change. A modest but consistent inverse association exists between childhood obesity and academic achievement. The relationship is multidimensional, reflecting interactions between biology, behavior, and social context, and highlights the need for school-centered, equity-focused prevention strategies. Addressing obesity as both a health and educational issue could yield dual benefits in cognitive development and long-term well-being.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.