ArticleVeterinary record open2026
Surgical confidence and competence among US veterinary students after a high-volume sterilisation campaign in rural Mexico.
Article in Veterinary record open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Surgical confidence and competence among US veterinary students after a high-volume sterilisation campaign in rural Mexico.Veterinary record open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate whether participation in a high-volume sterilisation campaign increases veterinary students' confidence in surgical and anaesthetic skills. We hypothesised that the intervention would improve confidence across key domains and lead to satisfactory technical competence. Design: Prospective, observational pre-post-intervention study. Setting: Field-based surgical campaign conducted over 10 days in eight rural communities in coastal Oaxaca, Mexico. Participants: Thirteen fourth-year veterinary students from two US universities volunteered to participate. Inclusion required students to be in their final year of training; all the students completed the study. Interventions: Participants engaged in a 10-day sterilisation campaign, assisting in pre-, intra- and post-operative care under the supervision of licensed veterinarians. Surgical procedures focused on ovariohysterectomy and orchiectomy in dogs and cats. Primary and secondary outcome measures: The primary outcome was change in self-reported confidence across 11 surgical domains, measured pre- and post-intervention using a 0-10 Likert scale. The secondary outcome was technical competence, which was assessed on the final day using a modified Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills rubric covering five domains. Results: Significant increases in confidence were observed in 10 of 11 domains (Wilcoxon Conclusions: Field sterilisation participation increased students' surgical confidence and end-of-campaign competence, but single-site uncontrolled sample and self-report limit generalisability; larger multisite controlled studies are needed objectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.