ArticleSisli Etfal Hastanesi tip bulteni2025
Pediatric Anaphylaxis in Emergency Care: A Detailed Analysis of Demographic and Laboratory Findings.
Article in Sisli Etfal Hastanesi tip bulteni, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Retrospective Evaluation of Patients Admitted to the Emergency Department Due to Anaphylaxis in Children: A Single-Center Study from Türkiye.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Anaphylaxis, which has been increasing in frequency parallel to other allergic diseases in recent years, is a life-threatening, acute systemic reaction. Physicians working in pediatric emergency departments (PED) should recognize the signs and symptoms of anaphylaxis and administer initial treatment. This study aims to evaluate the demographic, clinical, and laboratory findings of patients diagnosed with anaphylaxis in the pediatric emergency unit of a tertiary care facility. Methods: Patients diagnosed with anaphylaxis in our unit at the PED were retrospectively reviewed between 2016 and 2023. Results: A total of 100 patients were diagnosed with anaphylaxis in our pediatric emergency department, including 39 girls and 61 boys. Of these patients, 3% were under 2 years of age, 25% were between 2-6 years, and 72% were over 6 years old. In 83% of the cases, anaphylaxis occurred at home, while 11% occurred during medication administration at a hospital. Triggers were identified in 81% of the patients, whereas 19% were diagnosed with idiopathic anaphylaxis. The most common triggers were medications. Food-related anaphylaxis was the second most common trigger, with cow's milk being the most frequent at 8%. The most commonly affected system was the skin and mucosa in 97% of cases. When examining the relationship between age groups and triggers, food allergies were most frequent in children under 2 years old (p<0.001). The average tryptase level measured during anaphylaxis was 5.27 ug/L (1.43-33.6), with idiopathic cases showing a significantly higher average of 9.15 ug/L (6.29-33.6) (p=0.005). Conclusion: Anaphylaxis is a systemic reaction that can be fatal if not treated quickly and accurately. Adrenaline is the single most effective treatment, and pediatric emergency physicians play a crucial role in this context. Our findings suggest that tryptase levels in pediatric patients are often below the widely accepted cut-off; however, larger studies are needed before reference ranges can be redefined.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.