ArticleCureus2026
Material-Specific Surface Degradation of Pediatric Dental Restorations Following Iron Supplement Exposure: An In-Vitro Study.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effects of different iron preparations on the color stability of restorative materials: an in vitro study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction This study aimed to evaluate the material-specific effects of pediatric iron supplement exposure on the surface roughness of commonly used restorative materials. Methods In this in vitro study, two pediatric iron formulations, Ferrum® and Ferro Sanol® B, were tested on four restorative materials: composite resin, compomer, flowable composite, and glass ionomer cement (GIC). A total of 180 cylindrical specimens (5 × 3 mm) were prepared and allocated into twelve subgroups (n = 15). Specimens were immersed daily for two minutes in the assigned solutions and stored in distilled water between exposures. Surface roughness (Ra, μm) was measured at baseline, day one, day seven, and day 28 using a contact profilometer. Data were analyzed using repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Bonferroni and Tukey post hoc tests (p < 0.05). Results All restorative materials showed significant time-dependent increases in surface roughness (p < 0.001). At day 28, glass ionomer cement exhibited the highest Ra values under all conditions (control: 4.03 ± 0.97 μm; Ferrum®: 5.24 ± 0.99 μm; Ferro Sanol® B: 5.95 ± 1.82 μm). Resin-based materials demonstrated lower but significant roughness increases, with composite resin, compomer, and flowable composite showing greater Ra values after iron supplement exposure compared with controls (p < 0.05). Ferro Sanol® B generally induced higher roughness than Ferrum® at later time points, particularly in resin-based materials. Conclusion Exposure to pediatric iron supplements results in material-specific surface degradation of restorative materials. GIC is the most susceptible, while resin-based materials exhibit greater resistance, highlighting the importance of careful material selection in pediatric patients undergoing long-term iron supplementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.