Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41699948›Full record

ReviewNuclear medicine communications2026

Nuclear medicine in predicting hepatocellular carcinoma response.

Haibin Tu, Dingluan Lin, Xiaoxiong Wu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nuclear medicine communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Haibin TuDepartment of Ultrasound.
Dingluan LinDepartment of PET, Mengchao Hepatobiliary Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian.
Xiaoxiong WuInterventional Oncology Department, Seventh People's Hospital of Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.

Funding

Fujian Provincial Natural Science Foundation 2023J011480
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immune checkpoint inhibitors and anti-angiogenic targeted therapies have improved outcomes in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but responses remain heterogeneous, creating a need for noninvasive biomarkers to enable early treatment adaptation. We review clinical and translational evidence on nuclear medicine approaches - PET/computed tomography (CT), single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), radiomics, machine learning, and theranostics - for response prediction and prognostication in HCC treated with immunotherapy alone or in combination with targeted agents. Metabolic PET/CT, most commonly with 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose, supports pragmatic risk stratification; volumetric indices such as metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis generally provide stronger prognostic enrichment than single-voxel metrics, and an MTV threshold of greater than or equal to39.65 cm³ has been reported to associate with poorer outcomes. Immune-targeted PET/SPECT extends beyond metabolism by mapping target availability and heterogeneity (e.g. PD-L1) and immune activation or effector function (e.g. CD137, granzyme B), although current studies are often small and retrospective. PET-based radiomics and machine learning can generate imaging surrogates of immune phenotypes and aggressive biology, but reproducibility is limited by acquisition/reconstruction differences, segmentation variability, and scarce external validation. Theranostics offers an image-guided 'select-and-treat' paradigm for radionuclide therapy, yet target heterogeneity, dosimetry standardization, cost, and infrastructure remain barriers. Translation to routine care will require harmonized protocols, multicenter prospective validation, and demonstration of decision impact.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularLiver NeoplasmsNuclear MedicineHumansPrognosisRadiomicsTreatment Outcomehepatocellular carcinomaimmunotherapyPETradiomicssingle-photon emission computed tomography

Identifiers

PMID41699948
PMCPMC13134656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.