Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41699922›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of pain (London, England)2026

Therapeutic Writing Interventions for Adults With Chronic Pain: Experiences and Health Effects-A Systematic Review With a Narrative Synthesis.

Toni Salikka, Jari Kylmä, Sari Fröjd

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of pain (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Toni SalikkaSocial Psychiatry, Health Sciences Unit, Faculty of Social Sciences, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-6046-5047
Jari KylmäNursing Science, Health Sciences Unit, Faculty of Social Sciences, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6585-3205
Sari FröjdSocial Psychiatry, Health Sciences Unit, Faculty of Social Sciences, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6383-9028

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveChronic pain is often associated with heightened psychological stress, which may exacerbate symptoms and impair functioning. Therapeutic writing has been proposed as a low-cost adjunctive strategy. This review evaluated the reported experiences and health effects of writing interventions in adults with non-malignant chronic pain. DATABASES AND DATA TREATMENT: A systematic search of Web of Science, EBSCOhost, ProQuest, Ovid and Scopus (1999-November 5, 2025) identified studies examining health effects and experiences of therapeutic writing. Methodological quality was assessed using Joanna Briggs Institute tools, and certainty of evidence using GRADE and CERQual.

resultsTwenty-four studies involving 2477 adults were included. Therapeutic writing supported pain management through emotional processing, cognitive reappraisal and meaning-making. Health effects were modest, context‑dependent and typically short‑term, with small reductions in pain and improvements in psychological well-being but limited physical benefits. Effects varied according to individual characteristics, including negative affect and catastrophizing. Qualitative evidence described increased self‑understanding, empowerment and coping, especially in structured, group-based or cognitive-behavioral contexts, suggesting that benefits may partly reflect the broader therapeutic environment. Certainty of evidence ranged from low to moderate for quantitative outcomes and moderate to high for qualitative findings.

conclusionsTherapeutic writing may offer modest but meaningful psychological benefits for adults with chronic pain, although physical improvements appear fleeting. These findings support its use as a low-intensity adjunct within multidisciplinary pain management. Future research should employ mechanism‑focused, moderator‑sensitive trials and include process-level measures to clarify how writing exerts its effects and to identify the individuals most likely to benefit. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: This review clarifies when therapeutic writing may be clinically useful in chronic pain care: as a low-intensity adjunct that can support coping and psychological adjustment in specific contexts and patient groups. By integrating experiential and quantitative evidence, it highlights the importance of delivery structure, emotional pacing and patient characteristics, and identifies targets for better-designed interventions that can be safely incorporated into multidisciplinary pain management.

Indexed as

Chronic PainPain ManagementWritingAdaptation, PsychologicalAdultCoping SkillsHumans

Identifiers

PMID41699922
PMCPMC12910190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.