ArticleThe British journal of surgery2026
Effects of multimodal prehabilitation on surgery outcomes: prospective stepped-wedge, hospital-wide implementation study.
Article in The British journal of surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Multimodal prehabilitation and perioperative immune function in patients undergoing abdominal cancer surgery.The British journal of surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMultimodal prehabilitation may improve surgical outcomes in selected populations, but its real-world effectiveness remains unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of hospital-wide implementation of multimodal prehabilitation on postoperative complications and length of hospital stay in a diverse surgical population.
methodsThis single-centre, non-randomized stepped-wedge study (F4S PREHAB) was conducted at Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands from March 2019 to April 2024. Patients who underwent elective surgery across 20 clinical pathways received either standard preoperative care or multimodal prehabilitation comprising supervised exercise, nutritional support, psychological counselling, and smoking and alcohol cessation support. The primary outcome was the incidence and severity of postoperative complications within 30 days, with assessment of Clavien-Dindo (CD) grade ≥II complications and the dichotomized Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI). The secondary outcome was the length of hospital stay. Analyses used generalized linear models adjusted for time of inclusion and clinical pathway, as well as other confounders in some models. Subgroup analyses focused on patients who underwent high-risk gastrointestinal (GI) oncological surgery.
resultsDuring the study interval, 4131 patients received usual care (2660 patients) or prehabilitation (1471 patients). A total of 367 patients (24.9%) attended at least nine exercise sessions, indicating partial adherence. No significant differences between groups were found with regard to postoperative CD grade ≥II complications (adjusted risk ratio 1.02 (95% c.i. 0.90 to 1.16)) and CCI >22.6 (adjusted risk ratio 1.03 (95% c.i. 0.86 to 1.23)) or length of hospital stay (adjusted incidence rate ratio 1.04 (95% c.i. 0.92 to 1.18)). In the high-risk GI oncological surgery subgroup (1230 patients), the relative reduction in CD grade ≥II complication risk was 9%, but this was not statistically significant (adjusted risk ratio 0.91 (95% c.i. 0.75 to 1.10)).
conclusionHospital-wide implementation of multimodal prehabilitation did not reduce postoperative complications or length of hospital stay. A greater effect in high-risk patients suggests a targeted approach may be more effective. Future research should identify such patients and evaluate effectiveness of prehabilitation in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.