ReviewAustralasian journal on ageing2026
Improving Access to Cognitive Interventions for People With Dementia in Australian Community-Based Settings.
Review in Australasian journal on ageing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Neuroprotective Role of Exercise in Alzheimer's Disease: An Integrative Review of Animal and Human Studies.Neurology international · 2026Review
- Improving Access to Cognitive Interventions for People With Dementia in Australian Community-Based Settings.Australasian journal on ageing · 2026Review
- Advancements in non-pharmaceutical interventions for Alzheimer's disease management: an update review.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026Review
- Inverting the 'dementia triangle' as a salutogenic approach to avoiding the "treadmill of disasters" in changed behaviors: a qualitative study.Frontiers in dementia · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cognitive interventions, including cognitive stimulation therapy, cognitive rehabilitation and cognitive training, are increasingly recommended as key components of non-pharmacological post-diagnostic support for people with dementia. Cognitive interventions may help delay cognitive decline, enhance goal-directed functional abilities and improve quality of life. Despite inclusion in clinical guidelines and recommendations, guidance on the delivery of these interventions within Australian community settings remains limited and is underutilised. This article addresses a critical translation gap in cognitive interventions for people with dementia, synthesises the evidence through an Australian practice and policy lens, examines current uptake in community settings and identifies barriers, enablers and delivery models to inform implementation strategies. Community settings are defined as memory clinics, primary care, hospital outpatient services, allied health providers, community aged care and non-government providers. Current evidence indicates cognitive interventions have varying benefits across different outcomes, including cognitive function, social engagement, everyday functioning, quality of life and goal attainment. International practices related to implementation are explored, along with future directions for expanding access through technology, flexible delivery models, group-based approaches and integrating these interventions into existing care structures. Addressing the gap between recommendations and current practices requires building community awareness, improving access to professional education and training, and careful resource allocation. Cognitive interventions should be part of comprehensive rehabilitation and can be personalised to individual needs and goals. Expanding access and improving the availability of a range of cognitive interventions in community settings is crucial to ensure people with dementia receive best practice post-diagnostic support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.