Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41699900›Full record

ReviewAustralasian journal on ageing2026

Improving Access to Cognitive Interventions for People With Dementia in Australian Community-Based Settings.

Stephanie Mulhall, Diane Gibson, Wendy A Longley, Nathan M D'Cunha

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Australasian journal on ageing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Stephanie MulhallCentre for Ageing Research and Translation, Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, Bruce, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
Diane GibsonCentre for Ageing Research and Translation, Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, Bruce, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7235-3719
Wendy A LongleyUniting War Memorial Hospital, Waverley, New South Wales, Australia.
Nathan M D'CunhaCentre for Ageing Research and Translation, Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, Bruce, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4616-9931

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cognitive interventions, including cognitive stimulation therapy, cognitive rehabilitation and cognitive training, are increasingly recommended as key components of non-pharmacological post-diagnostic support for people with dementia. Cognitive interventions may help delay cognitive decline, enhance goal-directed functional abilities and improve quality of life. Despite inclusion in clinical guidelines and recommendations, guidance on the delivery of these interventions within Australian community settings remains limited and is underutilised. This article addresses a critical translation gap in cognitive interventions for people with dementia, synthesises the evidence through an Australian practice and policy lens, examines current uptake in community settings and identifies barriers, enablers and delivery models to inform implementation strategies. Community settings are defined as memory clinics, primary care, hospital outpatient services, allied health providers, community aged care and non-government providers. Current evidence indicates cognitive interventions have varying benefits across different outcomes, including cognitive function, social engagement, everyday functioning, quality of life and goal attainment. International practices related to implementation are explored, along with future directions for expanding access through technology, flexible delivery models, group-based approaches and integrating these interventions into existing care structures. Addressing the gap between recommendations and current practices requires building community awareness, improving access to professional education and training, and careful resource allocation. Cognitive interventions should be part of comprehensive rehabilitation and can be personalised to individual needs and goals. Expanding access and improving the availability of a range of cognitive interventions in community settings is crucial to ensure people with dementia receive best practice post-diagnostic support.

Indexed as

CognitionCommunity Health ServicesDementiaHealth Services AccessibilityAustraliaCognitive TrainingHumansQuality of LifeTreatment OutcomeAlzheimer diseasecommunity health servicesdementianeuropsychologyquality of liferehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID41699900
PMCPMC12910187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.