ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2026
The Work Undertaken by Patients and Their Families Whilst in the Emergency Department.
Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Work Undertaken by Patients and Their Families Whilst in the Emergency Department.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPatients sometimes stay a considerable length of time within Emergency Departments (EDs) and often leave with an incomplete understanding of their health problems and treatment. The complexity of how patients and their families make sense of emergency care and what they do throughout their journey is incompletely described, typically relying on retrospective interviews. This study describes the development of a typology of their thinking and doing, and how it can be used to explain reported outcomes and potentially make the patient's journey easier.
methodThis paper draws on the concept of patient work to explain how patient diagnostic and treatment journeys relate to the work of staff and their endurance of that journey. Observations and informal interviews with 51 adult patients and 8 family members were undertaken in an English ED. We construct a typology to develop the concept of patient and family work during their ED journey, and how this is shaped by a healthcare context (e.g., limited patient-staff relationships and overcrowding) that is very different from chronic illness contexts that previously applied the concept.
resultsFindings demonstrate how patients' sensemaking work is shaped by their expectations and informational exchanges with the clinician, but gaps in sensemaking exist. Sensemaking interacts with endurance work, that is, long waits in a noisy, public environment. Families participate in and often ameliorate patient sensemaking by seeking clarification, providing information, meeting patients' commitments and easing endurance work.
conclusionCollective analysis of patients' sensemaking and endurance work demonstrates how their diagnostic and treatment journeys shape patient experiences and navigation of ED healthcare encounters, with the potential to inform interventions to ease this work. PATIENT AND STAFF CONTRIBUTION: This study was informed by prior co-design and observation work with patients and staff during the development of a checklist to help meet patient information needs. This highlighted the centrality of the patient-staff interaction and the need to better understand it by directly observing the patient journey.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.