ArticleZoological letters2026
Hoxa9 compensates for the absence of Hoxc9 in suppressing limb-type motor neurons in sharks.
Article in Zoological letters, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe transition from fins to limbs in vertebrates required a novel organization of spinal motor neurons to coordinate limb muscle activation. In amniotes, Hoxc9 represses lateral motor column (LMC) identity at thoracic levels, restricting limb-innervating Foxp1+ motor neurons to brachial and lumbar levels. In elasmobranchs, however, the genomic organization of HoxC genes has undergone extensive modifications, and Foxp1+ LMC-like neurons have been identified at paired-fin levels in some elasmobranch species lacking Hoxc9. These observations suggest that alternative mechanisms regulate motor neuron fate in chondrichthyans, particularly in sharks, although the responsible factors remain unclear.
resultsTo identify the mechanism underlying this suppression, we examined Foxp1 and Hox gene expression in chicken and cloudy catshark (Scyliorhinus torazame) embryos. In chickens, Foxp1+ LMC neurons initially appeared at all rostrocaudal levels but became restricted to paired-limb levels through Hoxc9-mediated repression. In contrast, in cloudy catsharks, which lack Hoxc9, Foxp1 was downregulated at inter-fin levels where Hoxa9 is expressed. Sequence analysis revealed that the Foxp1 modulatory domain (MD), associated with LMC repression, is highly conserved in Hoxa9 across all examined chondrichthyan species. Hoxc9 genes are absent in most sharks but retained in rays and holocephalans, and these retained copies preserved the Foxp1 MD. Functional analysis in chicken embryos demonstrated that cloudy catshark Hoxa9 represses LMC identity and promotes preganglionic column (PGC) fate, similar to Hoxc9 in amniotes.
conclusionsThese findings suggest that conserved Hox9-dependent mechanisms restrict Foxp1+ motor neurons at thoracic levels in sharks. In the absence of Hoxc9, cloudy catshark Hoxa9 retains the ability to repress Foxp1 and promote PGC fate, thereby contributing to the organization of motor innervation at paired-fin levels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.