SynthesisJournal of health, population, and nutrition2026
Knowledge and practice towards healthcare-associated infection prevention among healthcare workers in East Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Journal of health, population, and nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPreventing healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) depends largely on healthcare workers knowledge and consistent application of infection prevention and control measures. However, despite the availability of global and regional guidelines, significant gaps remain, especially in low-resource settings. In East Africa, existing studies show wide variation in healthcare workers knowledge and practice levels, highlighting inconsistencies in the evidence base. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the knowledge and practice of healthcare workers towards healthcare-associated infection prevention in East Africa through a systematic review and meta-analysis.
methodThis systematic review and meta-analysis followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines. A comprehensive literature search was conducted across databases including PubMed, Embase, Scopus, ScienceDirect, AJOL, and institutional repositories to identify studies assessing healthcare workers' knowledge and practice regarding HAI prevention in East Africa. Meta-analysis was conducted using a random-effects model due to significant heterogeneity, and pooled prevalence estimates with 95% confidence intervals were reported. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were performed to explore heterogeneity, and publication bias was assessed using funnel plots and Egger's test.
resultsOut of 6,023 identified records, 41 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. These studies, encompassing 11,974 healthcare workers across East African countries, revealed that the pooled prevalence of adequate knowledge regarding HAI prevention was 64.71% (95% CI: 56-72), while the overall prevalence of good infection prevention practices was 55% (95% CI: 50-60). Subgroup analysis indicated that the highest knowledge level was reported in Eritrea (91%), and the lowest in Madagascar (37%). For practice, the highest adherence was observed in Zambia (80%) and the lowest in Sudan (33%). Substantial heterogeneity was noted across studies, prompting further subgroup and sensitivity analyses.
conclusionsThis review found that healthcare workers in East Africa have moderate knowledge and practice levels regarding HAI prevention, with notable variation across countries. To address these gaps, infection prevention and control programs should be strengthened through regular training, adequate resources, and institutional support. Enhanced policy enforcement and further research on country-specific challenges are also recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.