ArticleScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine2026
Improving prehospital and emergency care for patients with mental dysregulation: a comprehensive research agenda.
Article in Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo develop a research agenda on mental dysregulation in emergency care settings, that is informed and prioritized by patients' lived experiences, professional expertise from multiple emergency care domains, and the current state of science.
methodsThe Dialogue Model was employed to establish this research agenda. This approach is designed to promote equitable participation of patients and healthcare professionals in the research agenda-setting process. Within this model, a mixed-method approach was conducted, using secondary analysis of qualitative data, an online survey and interviews with key stakeholders, a literature review and a dialogue meeting. Key stakeholders were selected from all domains of the prehospital and emergency care system in the Netherlands, including persons with lived experience, nurses, physicians, mental health professionals and policymakers.
resultsA total of n = 29 key stakeholders were involved. A research agenda was developed which comprises two conditional themes (Understanding the scope and consequences of mental dysregulation in emergency care; Contact between healthcare professional and patient), three content themes (Support for emergency care professionals by teams and organizations; Adapting emergency care practices and environments to the needs of patients who experience mental dysregulation; Prevention of dysregulation and hospitalization in emergency care) and one organizational theme (Interdisciplinary collaboration around patients who experience mental dysregulation).
conclusionsWith this research agenda valuable research priorities are provided, acknowledged and prioritized by patients with mental dysregulation and healthcare professionals in the emergency care setting. By involving key stakeholders in the process of developing this research agenda, it covers multiple perspectives and has led to a mutual understanding. As such, it provides a valuable viewpoint for the future direction of research and practice in this field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.